Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977251›Full record

SynthesisCyberpsychology, behavior and social networking2020

Cyberbullying and Children and Young People's Mental Health: A Systematic Map of Systematic Reviews.

Irene Kwan, Kelly Dickson, Michelle Richardson, Wendy MacDowall, Helen Burchett, Claire Stansfield, Ginny Brunton, Katy Sutcliffe, James Thomas

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Irene KwanEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kelly DicksonEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle RichardsonEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Wendy MacDowallDepartment of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Helen BurchettDepartment of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Claire StansfieldEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ginny BruntonEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katy SutcliffeEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
James ThomasEvidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Department of Social Science, Institute of Education, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyberbullying is associated with considerable negative mental and psychosocial consequences in children and young people, making it a serious public health concern. To review the highest level of available evidence, a systematic mapping review was conducted to identify systematic reviews that investigated the relationship between cyberbullying and mental and psychological outcomes in young people. Topic-relevant bibliographic databases and online resources were searched to identify reviews published since 2007. Data were extracted using a coding tool developed for this study. Methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR criteria. Nineteen systematic reviews satisfied the inclusion criteria and they reported a strong negative association between cyberbullying and mental health outcomes in young people. Meta-analysis was performed in 11 reviews and narrative synthesis in 8 reviews. Data were derived from predominantly cross-sectional studies and a clear causal relationship between cyberbullying and mental outcomes cannot be established. Two-third of the included reviews were classified to be of low or unclear quality, due to the lack of quality assessment of the primary studies included in individual reviews. This systematic map consolidates available evidence at review level and confirms the existing gaps in longitudinal and qualitative evidence synthesis. Closer examination of the moderating factors influencing cyberbullying behaviors in future research can advance our understanding and inform the development of tailored programs of intervention to mitigate the negative impact of this phenomenon.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesCyberbullyingFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topicchildren and adolescencecyberbullyingmental health effectspsychosocial well-beingsystematic map

Identifiers

PMID31977251
PMCPMC7044782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.