Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977064›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) Score for Risk Stratification of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses.

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Edouard Poncelet, Aurelie Jalaguier-Coudray, Adalgisa Guerra, Laure S Fournier, Sanja Stojanovic, Ingrid Millet, Nishat Bharwani, Valerie Juhan, Teresa M Cunha and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02962596 (European Multicenter Validation of an ADNEXMR SCORING System for Characterizing Adnexal Masses), which is not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
30.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02962596 completednot on this map

European Multicenter Validation of an ADNEXMR SCORING System for Characterizing Adnexal Masses: EURAD-MR Classification

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2014 to 2018Enrolled1,340ConditionsOvarian TumorArmsADNEXMR SCORING system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. O-RADS for assessment of adnexal lesions: current status, challenges and future directions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraService de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Edouard PonceletService d'Imagerie de la Femme, Centre Hospitalier de Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Aurelie Jalaguier-CoudrayInstitut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Adalgisa GuerraHospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Laure S FournierDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Sanja StojanovicCentre for Radiology, Clinical Centre of Vojvodina, Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro.
Ingrid MilletLapeyronie Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nishat BharwaniDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Valerie JuhanHôpital de la Timone, Marseille, France.
Teresa M CunhaDepartment of Radiology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.
Gabriele MasselliDepartment of Radiology, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University Roma, Rome, Italy.
Corinne BalleyguierInstitut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France.
Caroline MalhaireInstitut Curie, Paris, France.
Nicolas F PerrotCentre Pyramides, Paris, France.
Elizabeth A SadowskiAmerican College of Radiology, Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging Committee.
Marc BazotService de Radiologie, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Patrice TaourelLapeyronie Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Raphaël PorcherCentre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institute national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Joint Research Unit 1153, Paris, France.
Emile DaraiService de Gynecologie et Obstetrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Univesitaires Est Parisien, Paris, France.
Caroline ReinholdAmerican College of Radiology, Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging Committee.
Andrea G RockallAmerican College of Radiology, Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging Committee.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRAmerican College of Radiology · USUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier de Valenciennes · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRHôpital Tenon · FRHospital da Luz · PTImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Novi Sad · RSUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health 14/31/04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Approximately one-quarter of adnexal masses detected at ultrasonography are indeterminate for benignity or malignancy, posing a substantial clinical dilemma. Objective: To validate the accuracy of a 5-point Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of adnexal masses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study was conducted between March 1, 2013, and March 31, 2016. Among patients undergoing expectant management, 2-year follow-up data were completed by March 31, 2018. A routine pelvic MRI was performed among consecutive patients referred to characterize a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass according to routine diagnostic practice at 15 referral centers. The MRI score was prospectively applied by 2 onsite readers and by 1 reader masked to clinical and ultrasonographic data. Data analysis was conducted between April and November 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the joint analysis of true-negative and false-negative rates according to the MRI score compared with the reference standard (ie, histology or 2-year follow-up). Results: A total of 1340 women (mean [range] age, 49 [18-96] years) were enrolled. Of 1194 evaluable women, 1130 (94.6%) had a pelvic mass on MRI with a reference standard (surgery, 768 [67.9%]; 2-year follow-up, 362 [32.1%]). A total of 203 patients (18.0%) had at least 1 malignant adnexal or nonadnexal pelvic mass. No invasive cancer was assigned a score of 2. Positive likelihood ratios were 0.01 for score 2, 0.27 for score 3, 4.42 for score 4, and 38.81 for score 5. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.961 (95% CI, 0.948-0.971) among experienced readers, with a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96; 189 of 203 patients) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.93; 848 of 927 patients). There was good interrater agreement among both experienced and junior readers (κ = 0.784; 95% CI, 0.743-0824). Of 580 of 1130 women (51.3%) with a mass on MRI and no specific gynecological symptoms, 362 (62.4%) underwent surgery. Of them, 244 (67.4%) had benign lesions and a score of 3 or less. The MRI score correctly reclassified the mass origin as nonadnexal with a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-0.99; 1360 of 1372 patients) and a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71-0.85; 102 of 130 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the O-RADS MRI score was accurate when stratifying the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.

Indexed as

False Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedOvarian DiseasesRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31977064
PMCPMC6991280
OpenAlexW3001891735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.