Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31977057›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Comparison of Mortality and Major Cardiovascular Events Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Human vs Analogue Insulins.

Romain Neugebauer, Emily B Schroeder, Kristi Reynolds, Julie A Schmittdiel, Linda Loes, Wendy Dyer, Jay R Desai, Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez, P Michael Ho, Jeff P Anderson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Romain NeugebauerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Emily B SchroederKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Aurora.
Kristi ReynoldsDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Julie A SchmittdielDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Linda LoesHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wendy DyerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Jay R DesaiHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Gabriela Vazquez-BenitezHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
P Michael HoRocky Mountain Regional Veterans Affairs and University of Colorado (Anschutz) Medical Center, Denver.
Jeff P AndersonHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Noel PimentelDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Patrick J O'ConnorHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kaiser Permanente · USHealthPartners · US

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
CV Benefits and Safety of Glucose-Lowering Therapies in Adults with DiabetesR01HL124461 · NHLBI · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI O'CONNOR, PATRICK J · 2014 to 2017
$3.1M
Blood Pressure and Progression of Diabetic Kidney DiseaseK23DK099237 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SCHROEDER, EMILY BARTLETT · 2014 to 2018
$869k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124461NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK099237NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The comparative cardiovascular safety of analogue and human insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes who initiate insulin therapy in usual care settings has not been carefully evaluated using machine learning and other rigorous analytic methods. Objective: To examine the association of analogue vs human insulin use with mortality and major cardiovascular events. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 127 600 adults aged 21 to 89 years with type 2 diabetes at 4 health care delivery systems who initiated insulin therapy from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2013. Machine learning and rigorous inference methods with time-varying exposures were used to evaluate associations of continuous exposure to analogue vs human insulins with mortality and major cardiovascular events. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018. Exposures: On the index date (first insulin dispensing), participants were classified as using analogue insulin with or without human insulin or human insulin only. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall mortality, mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (CHF) were evaluated. Marginal structural modeling (MSM) with inverse probability weighting was used to compare event-free survival in separate per-protocol analyses. Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios and cumulative risk differences were based on logistic MSM parameterizations for counterfactual hazards. Propensity scores were estimated using a data-adaptive approach (machine learning) based on 3 nested covariate adjustment sets. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address potential residual confounding from unmeasured differences in risk factors across delivery systems. Results: The 127 600 participants (mean [SD] age, 59.4 [12.6] years; 68 588 men [53.8%]; mean [SD] body mass index, 32.3 [7.1]) had a median follow-up of 4 quarters (interquartile range, 3-9 quarters) and experienced 5464 deaths overall (4.3%), 1729 MIs (1.4%), 1301 CVAs (1.0%), and 3082 CHF hospitalizations (2.4%). There were no differences in adjusted hazard ratios for continuous analogue vs human insulin exposure during 10 quarters for overall mortality (1.15; 95% CI, 0.97-1.34), CVD mortality (1.26; 95% CI, 0.86-1.66), MI (1.11; 95% CI, 0.77-1.45), CVA (1.30; 95% CI, 0.81-1.78), or CHF hospitalization (0.93; 95% CI, 0.75-1.11). Conclusions and Relevance: Insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes who initiate and continue treatment with human vs analogue insulins had similar observed rates of major cardiovascular events, CVD mortality, and overall mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic CardiomyopathiesFemaleHeart FailureHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin, Regular, HumanMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin, Regular, Human

Identifiers

PMID31977057
PMCPMC6991251
OpenAlexW3001457541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.