ArticleThe Behavior analyst2016
On the Social Acceptability of Behavior-Analytic Terms: Crowdsourced Comparisons of Lay and Technical Language.
Article in The Behavior analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Considerations for Applied Behavior Analysts Embracing Intersectional Qualitative Research Within the Context of Intervention Research.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Practical Resources for Embedding Opportunities to Practice Dissemination-Related Skills Into Coursework and Supervision Experiences.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Review
- A Call to Action for Qualitative Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Neurodiversity-Affirming Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- A Family-Centered Care Approach to Behavior-Analytic Assessment and Intervention.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Compassion: The Eighth Dimension of Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Organizational Behavior Management Approaches to Advancing Compassionate Care in Research and Practice.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Supporting Immigrant Families in Special Education: Insights and Collaborative Strategies for School-Based ABA Practitioners.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Review
- Context and Meaning in Acts of Translation and Interpretation.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2025Review
- Introducing LADER: A Structured Approach to Effective Professional Interactions for Behavior Analysts.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Lexicon-Based Sentiment Analysis in Behavioral Research.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- Putting Concepts Into Action: A Brief Description of 2022 BACB Ethics Code Standard 1.07 & Actionable Recommendations for Evolving Practices of Behavior Analysts.Behavior analysis in practice · 2024Review
- Recommendations for Working with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Families: A Report from the Field.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Parents' Emotional Responses to Behavior Analysis Terms: A Comparative Analysis.The Analysis of verbal behavior · 2023Article
- The Ethical Obligations, Barriers, and Solutions for Interprofessional Collaboration in the Treatment of Autistic Individuals.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Review
- Measuring the Dissemination Impact of Culturo-Behavioral Science.Behavior and social issues · 2023Article
- Behavior analytic jargon does not seem to influence treatment acceptability ratings.Journal of applied behavior analysis · 2022Article
- Building a Social Justice Framework for Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in ABA.Behavior analysis in practice · 2022Review
- Logical fallacies and misinterpretations that hinder progress in translational addiction neuroscience.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2022Article
- Humble Behaviorism Redux.Behavior and social issues · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavior analysis has a marketing problem. Although behavior analysts have speculated about the problems regarding our technical behavior-analytic terminology and how our terminology has hindered the dissemination of behavior analysis to outsiders, few have investigated the social acceptability of the terminology. The present paper reports the general public's reactions to technical behavioral jargon versus non-technical substitute terms that refer to applied behavior-analytic techniques. Two-hundred participants, all non-behavior analysts, were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and completed a survey on the social acceptability of behavioral jargon and non-technical terms. Specifically, participants rated the acceptability of how the six pairs of terms (technical and non-technical) sounded if the treatments were to be implemented for each of 10 potential populations of clients that behavior analysts typically work with. The results show that, overall, members of the general public found non-technical substitute terms more acceptable than technical behavior-analytic terms. The finding suggests that specialized vocabulary of behavior analysis may create hurdles to the acceptability of applied behavior-analytic services. The implication of these findings suggest the importance of a systematic investigation of listener behavior with respect to behavior analysis terms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.