Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31976861›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Human hippocampal CA3 damage disrupts both recent and remote episodic memories.

Thomas D Miller, Trevor T-J Chong, Anne M Aimola Davies, Michael R Johnson, Sarosh R Irani, Masud Husain, Tammy Wc Ng, Saiju Jacob, Paul Maddison, Christopher Kennard and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diencephalic integrity explains aspects of hippocampal amnesia.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas D MillerNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Trevor T-J ChongMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7764-3811
Anne M Aimola DaviesDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael R JohnsonDivision of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarosh R IraniNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Masud HusainNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tammy Wc NgDepartment of Anaesthestics, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Saiju JacobNeurology Department, Queen Elizabeth Neuroscience Centre, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Paul MaddisonNeurology Department, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Christopher KennardNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Penny A GowlandSir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Clive R RosenthalNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5960-4648
University of Oxford · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBAustralian National University · AUImperial College London · GBMonash University · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust 206330/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neocortical-hippocampal interactions support new episodic (event) memories, but there is conflicting evidence about the dependence of remote episodic memories on the hippocampus. In line with systems consolidation and computational theories of episodic memory, evidence from model organisms suggests that the cornu ammonis 3 (CA3) hippocampal subfield supports recent, but not remote, episodic retrieval. In this study, we demonstrated that recent and remote memories were susceptible to a loss of episodic detail in human participants with focal bilateral damage to CA3. Graph theoretic analyses of 7.0-Tesla resting-state fMRI data revealed that CA3 damage disrupted functional integration across the medial temporal lobe (MTL) subsystem of the default network. The loss of functional integration in MTL subsystem regions was predictive of autobiographical episodic retrieval performance. We conclude that human CA3 is necessary for the retrieval of episodic memories long after their initial acquisition and functional integration of the default network is important for autobiographical episodic memory performance.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAgedCA3 Region, HippocampalCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLimbic EncephalitisMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedTemporal Lobecornu ammonisdefault networkepisodic memoryhippocampal subfieldshumanhuman biologyLGI1-antibody limbic encephalitismedicineneuroscienceretrograde amnesia

Identifiers

PMID31976861
PMCPMC6980860
OpenAlexW3001008665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.