ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2019
Furthering Open Science in Behavior Analysis: An Introduction and Tutorial for Using GitHub in Research.
Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Twenty-five years of simulated demand: A bibliometric and systematic review of hypothetical drug purchase tasks.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Experiences and Needs of Leaders Supporting Multilingual ABA Staff: A Qualitative Exploration.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Relational Databases for Behavior Science.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Article
- Advocacy and Open Science in the UK: Case Studies in the Autism Wars.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025Article
- Machine learning for catalysing the integration of noncoding RNA in research and clinical practice.EBioMedicine · 2024Review
- Perspective: use and reuse of NMR-based metabolomics data: what works and what remains challenging.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2024Review
- Understanding Individual Subject Differences through Large Behavioral Datasets: Analytical and Statistical Considerations.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- cometrics: A New Software Tool for Behavior-analytic Clinicians and Machine Learning Researchers.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Evaluating Professional Behavior Analysts' Literature Searches.Behavior analysis in practice · 2023Article
- Hyperbolic discounting and exponentiated demand: Modeling demand for cigarettes in three dimensions.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2023Article
- Meta-Analytic Methods to Detect Publication Bias in Behavior Science Research.Perspectives on behavior science · 2022Article
- Applying Mixed-Effects Modeling to Behavioral Economic Demand: An Introduction.Perspectives on behavior science · 2021Article
- Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Editorial: Emerging Cultural and Behavioral Systems Science.Perspectives on behavior science · 2019Article
- Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.Infant and child developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open and transparent practices in scholarly research are increasingly encouraged by academic journals and funding agencies. Various elements of behavior analytic research are communicated transparently, though it is not common practice to archive study materials to support future replications. This tutorial presents a review of the Transparent and Open Practices guidelines provided by the Open Science Foundation and provides instructions on how behavior analysts can use GitHub transparency in research across multiple levels. GitHub is presented as a service that can be used to publicly archive various elements of research and is uniquely suited to research that is technical, data driven, and collaborative. The GitHub platform is reviewed, and the steps necessary to create an account, initialize repositories, archive study files, and synchronize changes to remote repositories are described in several examples. Implications of increased calls for transparency and modern statistical methods are discussed with regard to behavior analysis, and archiving platforms such as GitHub are reviewed as one means of supporting transparent research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.