ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2019
An Overview of Scientific Reproducibility: Consideration of Relevant Issues for Behavior Science/Analysis.
Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritising measures and interventions to strengthen research reproducibility: a Delphi consultation study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Validation of the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT): A Replication Study of Diagnostic Accuracy.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- A tutorial for software options to aid in assessing functional relations in single-case experimental designs.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Biological Systems Depend on Communication Over Distances: A Review of the Fundamental Mechanisms, Associated challenges, and the Potential Effect of the Constrained Disorder Principle.Acta biotheoretica · 2026Review
- Advancing evidence-informed practice in modern zoos: research priorities for animal welfare, conservation, and social legitimacy.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Oxytocin: a neglected hormone in pituitary disease - From function to the diagnosis of a deficiency, resulting clinical relevance, and potential treatment options in endocrinology.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Review
- A metric of knowledge as information compression reflects reproducibility predictions for biomedical experiments.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Small Molecule Myeloperoxidase (MPO) Inhibition Prevents Delayed Cerebral Injury (DCI) After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) in a Murine Model.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- A multi-institutional investigation of psilocybin's effects on mouse behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Levels of Replication.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Article
- The ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines: Importance and Full Adoption by AALAS Journals.Comparative medicine · 2024Article
- The ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines: Importance and Full Adoption by AALAS Journals.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2024Article
- Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Modeling (GLMM) of Functional Analysis Graphical Construction Elements on Visual Analysis.Perspectives on behavior science · 2024Article
- Testing delayed, gradual, and temporary treatment effects in randomized single-case experiments: A general response function framework.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Analytical methods and experimental quality in studies targeting carbonyls in electronic cigarette aerosols.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Review
- Unravelling the many facets of human cooperation in an experimental study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Causal models and causal modelling in obesity: foundations, methods and evidence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Advances in human oxytocin measurement: challenges and proposed solutions.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- Article
- Clinical Animal Behaviour: Paradigms, Problems and Practice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For over a decade, the failure to reproduce findings in several disciplines, including the biomedical, behavioral, and social sciences, have led some authors to claim that there is a so-called "replication (or reproducibility) crisis" in those disciplines. The current article examines: (a) various aspects of the reproducibility of scientific studies, including definitions of reproducibility; (b) published concerns about reproducibility in the scientific literature and public press; (c) variables involved in assessing the success of attempts to reproduce a study; (d) suggested factors responsible for reproducibility failures; (e) types of validity of experimental studies and threats to validity as they relate to reproducibility; and (f) evidence for threats to reproducibility in the behavior science/analysis literature. Suggestions for improving the reproducibility of studies in behavior science and analysis are described throughout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.