Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31976260›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2019

The Best and Worst Things Staff Report About Behavioral Training Workshops: a Large-Scale Evaluation.

Dennis H Reid, Carolyn W Green, Marsha B Parsons, David A Rotholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barriers and Facilitators to Staff's Implementation of Behaviour Support Plans in Community Settings.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dennis H ReidCarolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center, P. O. Box 425, Morganton, NC 28680 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2041-9605
Carolyn W GreenCarolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center, P. O. Box 425, Morganton, NC 28680 USA.
Marsha B ParsonsCarolina Behavior Analysis and Support Center, P. O. Box 425, Morganton, NC 28680 USA.
David A Rotholz2School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variable affecting the success of staff training programs conducted by behavior analysts is trainee acceptance of the training. This study constituted a large-scale evaluation of staff acceptance of behavioral training workshops. Over a 10-year period, 646 human service staff who participated in 132 workshops were questioned regarding the best and worst thing about the workshops. The most common staff comments concerning the best thing pertained to the training content, followed closely by trainer style and then trainee activities. There were far fewer comments regarding the worst thing, with most involving aspects of the physical environment in which training occurred. Implications of the results for practitioners are offered in terms of conducting workshop training in accordance with trainees' reported preferences. Emphasis is placed on ensuring training content is specific in nature as well as new and relevant for the trainees' work situation, providing frequent demonstrations and examples, and structuring repeated opportunities for active trainee responding.

Indexed as

Social validityStaff trainingTraining acceptabilityWorkshop training

Identifiers

PMID31976260
PMCPMC6743519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.