ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2020
Comparison of Two Wavefront Autorefractors: Binocular Open-Field versus Monocular Closed-Field.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of fogging lenses on accommodation using an open-view portable wavefront autorefractor.Journal of optometry · 2026Article
- Feasibility, agreement, and time savings of PHANTOM open-field binocular integrated refraction versus conventional clinical refraction in healthy young adults.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Effect of six different autorefractor designs on the precision and accuracy of refractive error measurement.PloS one · 2022Article
- Agreement and Repeatability of Central and Peripheral Refraction by One Novel Multispectral-Based Refractor.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Hand-Held Nidek versus Table-Mounted Huvitz Autorefractors and Their Agreement with Subjective Refraction in Adults.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Effect of Instrument Design and Technique on the Precision and Accuracy of Objective Refraction Measurement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects.Journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Accuracy and precision of automated subjective refraction in young hyperopes under cycloplegia.Journal of optometryArticle
- Assessment of an algorithm-based combination device for objective and subjective refraction: accuracy and efficiency across examiner experience levels.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the agreement and repeatability between a new commercially available binocular open-field wavefront autorefractor, as part of the Eye Refract system, and a monocular closed-field wavefront autorefractor (VX110).
methodsA cross-sectional, randomized, and single-masked study was performed. Ninety-nine eyes of 99 healthy participants (37.22 ± 18.04 years, range 8 to 69 years) were randomly analyzed. Three measurements with the Eye Refract and the VX110 were taken on three different days, under noncycloplegic conditions. Mean spherical equivalent (MSE), cylindrical vectors (J0 and J45), and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) were compared between both autorefractors. An intersession repeatability analysis was done considering the values of repeatability (
resultsThe VX110 showed more negative values (
conclusionsThe Eye Refract provided enough accuracy and reliability to estimate refractive errors in different age groups, achieving better results than the VX110. Therefore, the Eye Refract proved to be a useful autorefractor to be incorporated into clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.