Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31976078›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Acceptability of a computer-tailored and pedometer-based socio-cognitive intervention in a secondary coronary heart disease prevention program: A qualitative study.

Julie Houle, Maria-Cecilia Gallani, Myriam Pettigrew, Geneviève Laflamme, Luc Mathieu, François Boudreau, Paul Poirier, Sylvie Cossette

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julie HouleNursing Department, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-883X
Maria-Cecilia GallaniFaculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Canada.
Myriam PettigrewFaculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Canada.
Geneviève LaflammeNursing Department, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Luc MathieuFaculty of Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada.
François BoudreauNursing Department, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Paul PoirierFaculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Canada.
Sylvie CossetteFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CAUniversité Laval · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When developing an innovative intervention, its acceptability to patients, health care professionals and managers must be considered to ensure the implementation into practice. This study aims to identify factors influencing the acceptability of a computer-tailored and pedometer-based socio-cognitive intervention for patients with heart disease. Focus group interviews were conducted in two outlying regions of the province of Quebec (Canada). The Theory of Planned Behavior formed the theoretical basis of the interview guide. Two researchers performed verbatim analysis independently until consensus was achieved. The sample included 44 participants divided into six groups (patients

Indexed as

acceptability studyComputer-tailoredpedometer-based interventionphysical activitysecondary preventionsocio-cognitive intervention

Identifiers

PMID31976078
PMCPMC6956605
OpenAlexW2999160114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.