Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975987›Full record

ReviewPrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2019

Multidisciplinary management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms.A clinical and psychological overview.

Valentina Lucia La Rosa, Michał Ciebiera, Li-Te Lin, Zaki Sleiman, Tais Marques Cerentini, Patricia Lordelo, Ilker Kahramanoglu, Simone Bruni, Simone Garzon, Michele Fichera

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Valentina Lucia La RosaUnit of Psychodiagnostics and Clinical Psychology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Michał CiebieraSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Li-Te LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Zaki SleimanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tais Marques CerentiniPostgraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Patricia LordeloBahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador, Brazil.
Ilker KahramanogluDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Simone BruniDepartment of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Simone GarzonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Michele FicheraDepartment of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
University of Catania · ITEscola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública · BRIstanbul University · TRKaohsiung Veterans General Hospital · TWLebanese American University · LBOspedale Filippo Del Ponte Varese · ITPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although female sexual dysfunctions are common among women with urogynecological conditions, they have not been thoroughly studied and there are still many questions without an answer. The recent evidence on sexual disorders in women with urogynecological diseases shows a quite wide spectrum of therapeutic approaches, which require the physicians to take into account not only the primary symptoms, but also all the associated factors negatively affected. It has been widely underlined that gynecological diseases are often associated with high stress and have a negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being of women affected. For this reason, a multidisciplinary approach for the management of these diseases is highly recommended. Also in the case of urogynecological disorders, it is important to take into account psychological outcomes throughout the diagnostic and therapeutic process. In the light of these considerations, the aim of this short review is to evaluate the impact of the main urogynecological diseases and the currently available therapeutic options in order to improve quality of life and sexuality of these patients and to stress the need for a multidisciplinary approach in order to minimize the negative consequences of these diseases for the sexual well-being of women and their partners.

Indexed as

LUTSpelvic organ prolapsequality of lifesexualityurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31975987
PMCPMC6970416
OpenAlexW2994211318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.