ReviewFocus (American Psychiatric Publishing)2017
Evidence-Based Psychotherapy in Primary Care.
Review in Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of a transdiagnostic mental health intervention in German primary care: study protocol for a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster randomised controlled pilot study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2025Article
- Toward a Comprehensive Model of Medical-Dental-Behavioral Integration.JDR clinical and translational research · 2024Article
- Study What You Do: Developing a Psychotherapy Tracking Database in a Large-Scale Integrated Behavioral Health Service.Annals of family medicine · 2023Article
- Adaptations of an Integrated Behavioral Health Program During COVID-19.Cognitive and behavioral practice · 2021Article
- The Role of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Treating Depression.Current psychiatry reports · 2020Review
- Advances in Collaborative Care.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The functional and financial effects of untreated psychiatric disorders within primary care have led to the development of novel service delivery models to improve access to high-quality, evidence-based mental health treatments. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious and effective psychotherapeutic approach for treating a broad range of mental health conditions. CBT is a practical, skill-building approach that emphasizes self-efficacy and self-management of symptoms while working toward defined and measurable treatment goals. Although significant barriers to the full dissemination of CBT remain, collaborative care and integrated behavioral health programs embedded within primary care clinics can enhance treatment outcomes by using CBT. Identifying core CBT principles used in the treatment of anxiety (e.g., exposure), depression (e.g., behavioral activation), and insomnia (e.g., stimulus control) is an important step toward improving the quality of care for these conditions. High-impact, low-intensity CBT programs hold promise in improving access to this evidence-based treatment across a broader population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.