Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975537›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2020

Comparative analysis on the effect of Z-plasty versus conventional simple excision for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A retrospective randomised clinical study.

Yong-Ping Yang, Ling-Yun Yu, Yi-Zhuo Wang, Jian Shi, Jian-Nan Li, Feng-Jia Shang, Jiao Wu, Tong-Jun Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. [Effectiveness of fascial tissue flaps and skin flaps with layered sutures for repair of wounds after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yong-Ping YangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6605-1343
Ling-Yun YuDepartment of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yi-Zhuo WangDepartment of Cancer Center, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jian ShiDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jian-Nan LiDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Feng-Jia ShangDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jiao WuDepartment of Andrology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tong-Jun LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University · CNJilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus is one of common diseases in general department. However, it is characterised, for surgeons, by high post-surgical recurrence and high incidence of post-surgical wound complications. Due to that fact, this retrospective randomised clinical study was designed to evaluate the surgical procedure effect of Z-plasty (ZP), compared with convention simple excision (SE). A total of 67 patients from May 2015 to May 2019 in our department were studied into two groups randomly, the group of ZP and the group of SE. The patients' characteristics, surgical data, hospital length of stay (LOS), and post-surgery complications were recorded. Statistical approaches were proceed with P-value analysis. The results are as follows. No significant differences were found between these two groups of the ages, gender distribution, Body Mass Index (BMI), smoking history, diabetes mellitus, and blood hypertension. The estimated blood loss, specimen volume, distance to anus, and drain output on the first day of post-surgery between the two groups were not statistically significant, either. However, surgical time in the ZP group was longer than that in the SE group (P < .0001). LOS in the ZP group was obviously shorter than that in the SE group (P = .0051). Furthermore, the patients of the ZP group were tending to suffer from fewer post-surgical complications than the ones of the SE group. In a conclusion, we hold the point view that the surgical procedure of ZP can lead a better outcome than SE because it demonstrated shortened LOS and fewer post-surgical complications.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlgorithmsChinaFemaleHumansLength of StayMalePilonidal SinusPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesSacrococcygeal RegionSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeWound HealingYoung AdultSacrococcygeal pilonidal sinustension-freeZ-plasty

Identifiers

PMID31975537
PMCPMC7217047
OpenAlexW3001484925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.