Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975444›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2020

Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T.

Matthew F Koff, Alissa J Burge, Hollis G Potter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05151315 (Component Migration, Polyethylene Wear, and Joint Inflammation of the Evolution Versus Evolution NitrX Total Knee Arthroplasty System), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05151315 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Component Migration, Polyethylene Wear, and Joint Inflammation of the Evolution Versus Evolution NitrX Total Knee Arthroplasty System

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2022 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsTotal Knee Arthroplasty, Knee Osteoarthritis, Radiostereometric AnalysisArmsTotal Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution® NitrX™ Knee System, Total Knee Arthroplasty with Evolution Knee System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical implementation of MRI for evaluation of titanium press-fit osseointegration implants.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew F KoffDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6969-0183
Alissa J BurgeDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Hollis G PotterDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Hospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

The Ability of MRI to Detect Adverse Local Tissue Reaction and Implant Integration as a Function of Hip Implant ModularityR01AR064840 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI KOFF, MATTHEW F., POTTER, HOLLIS G. · 2013 to 2023
$5.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has historically been avoided for the routine clinical evaluation of metal implants at many clinical centers due to the presence of artifact that creates in-plane and through-plane distortions and signal intensity voids in generated images. However, when the image acquisition parameters are appropriately modified and advanced multi-spectral pulse sequences are used, high-quality diagnostic images can be generated and may be used for diagnosing patients with suspected periprosthetic pathology. MRI provides superior soft-tissue contrast and excellent sensitivity for mobile water and is, therefore, a valuable tool in the evaluation of these patients, given the increasing prevalence of arthroplasty within the general population. Knowledge of expected normal postoperative appearance in patients with total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty facilitates the detection of abnormal findings in this population, as does familiarity with common pathologic conditions encountered in the periprosthetic region. This review article will provide background information regarding the presence of image artifacts, methods to reduce the artifacts, and application of MRI at 1.5 T for evaluating common complications in subjects with total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, and total shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingArthroplasty, ReplacementHumansPeriprosthetic FracturesSynovial Membraneadverse soft tissue reactionarthroplastyarthroplasty-hiparthroplasty-kneediagnostic imagingimplant fixationimplant wear

Identifiers

PMID31975444
PMCPMC7293946
OpenAlexW3000870351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.