Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975398›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2020

Analysis of the spatial distribution of cases of Zika virus infection and congenital Zika virus syndrome in a state in the southeastern region of Brazil: Sociodemographic factors and implications for public health.

Helaine J S Mocelin, Rafael C Catão, Paula S S Freitas, Thiago N Prado, Adelmo I Bertolde, Marcia C Castro, Ethel L N Maciel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helaine J S MocelinLaboratory of Epidemiology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Rafael C CatãoDepartament of Geography, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Paula S S FreitasLaboratory of Epidemiology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Thiago N PradoLaboratory of Epidemiology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Adelmo I BertoldeLaboratory of Epidemiology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Marcia C CastroDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ethel L N MacielLaboratory of Epidemiology, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRHarvard Global Health Institute · US

Funding

HRP, TDR, WHO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo perform spatial distribution analysis of reported cases of Zika virus and congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, by neighborhood, and relate the results to sociodemographic indicators and implications for the health process.

methodsAn ecological study using data from the 2016 National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, epidemiological records, and information on neighborhoods of families confirmed with CZS from qualitative field research.

resultsSociodemographic indicators were analyzed in three distinct groups: general population with Zika virus, pregnant women with Zika virus, and cases of CZS visited. For the three groups, average literacy rates were 71.1%, 71.0%, and 68.3%; the average income per minimum wage was 1.4, 1.1, and 1.4; sanitary sewage coverage was 75.6%, 76.1%, and 71.4%; garbage coverage was 90.8%, 91.2%, and 89.2%; and water supply was 93.8%, 94.1% and 93.8%, respectively. Socioeconomic indicators showed no significant differences between groups, although they were above the national average. A nonsignificant variation of 68.3%-71.1% was seen in the average literacy level above 15 years of age.

conclusionSocioeconomic and demographic indicators of cases of Zika virus infection and CZS may indicate that the outbreak had different impacts according to class, social group, or gender, reflecting the persistence and social geography of inequality in Brazil.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilDisease OutbreaksEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansIncidenceLiteracyMaleMicrocephalyMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPublic HealthSocioeconomic FactorsBrazilCongenital Zika virus syndromePublic healthSpatial distributionZika virus infection

Identifiers

PMID31975398
PMCPMC7065179
OpenAlexW3002192795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.