Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975396›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2020

Patient characteristics and pregnancy outcomes among Zika-infected pregnant women: Epidemiologic surveillance data from two cities in Colombia, 2015-2016.

Jovana A Ocampo Cañas, David Caviedes Combita, Helvert F Molina Leon, Andrés M Garcia Sierra, Luis J Hernández Florez

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jovana A Ocampo CañasPublic Health, Medical Education, and Professionalism Research group, School of Medicine, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
David Caviedes CombitaPublic Health, Medical Education, and Professionalism Research group, School of Medicine, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Helvert F Molina LeonPublic Health, Medical Education, and Professionalism Research group, School of Medicine, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés M Garcia SierraPublic Health, Medical Education, and Professionalism Research group, School of Medicine, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Luis J Hernández FlorezPublic Health, Medical Education, and Professionalism Research group, School of Medicine, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

HRPTDRWHO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the characteristics of pregnant women infected with Zika virus in two representative regions of Colombia, examine their pregnancy outcomes, and outline findings of the epidemiologic surveillance program established during the peak of the 2015-2016 epidemic.

methodsA cohort study conducted in the municipalities of Cali and Villavicencio using data from the National Public Health Surveillance System (SIVIGILA) and clinical follow-up data from pregnant women. We describe sociodemographic characteristics, health insurance status, Zika virus, pregnancy-related characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes.

resultsA total of 1259 Zika-infected pregnant women were identified in Cali; of these, 2.3% (n=27) experienced pregnancy loss, 9.5% (n=113) had preterm birth, and 7.9% (n=91) had a low birthweight neonate. In Villavicencio, 3.0% (n=13) experienced pregnancy loss, 6.9% (n=30) had preterm birth, and 6.7% (n=28) had a low birthweight neonate. Compared with the general population, this population of Zika-infected pregnant women did not experience an increased frequency of preterm birth or low birthweight (relative risk of prematurity and low birthweight infant <1).

conclusionsEpidemiologic surveillance data showed that most neonates of Zika-infected pregnant women were born at term, and that the frequency of low birthweight neonates was low. Good quality data were obtained from the surveillance registries.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesColombiaEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomeRegistriesUrban PopulationZika Virus InfectionColombiaEpidemiologic surveillanceLow birthweightPregnancy outcomesPreterm birthZika virus

Identifiers

PMID31975396
PMCPMC7064914
OpenAlexW3002691754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.