Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31975292›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

EMS Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis Seeds.

C Stewart Gillmor, Wolfgang Lukowitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genetic suppressor ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Mapping of dwarfing gene and identification of mutant allele on plant height in wheat.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic Screening of Factors in the Plant Protein Secretion.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C Stewart GillmorLaboratorio Nacional de Genómica para la Biodiversidad (Langebio), Unidad de Genómica Avanzada, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (CINVESTAV-IPN), Irapuato, Mexico.
Wolfgang LukowitzDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA. lukowitz@uga.edu.
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute · MXUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ethylating agent ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) is widely used for inducing random point mutations. In Arabidopsis, treatment with EMS causes GC-to-AT transitions with great efficiency: it has been estimated that a population of 50,000 well-mutagenized plants harbors one or more transitions in almost every GC pair of the genome. These properties, combined with ease of use, make EMS a mutagen of choice for genetic screens. Here, we describe a protocol for mutagenizing Arabidopsis seed with EMS. In addition, we briefly consider the germ line sectors typically induced by this treatment, and approaches for estimating the rate of induced mutations.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisEthyl MethanesulfonateMutagenesisMutagensMutationMutation RateSeedsEthyl MethanesulfonateMutagensEmbryo defectiveGenetic mosaicGerm line sectorMutagenesis efficiencySeed mutant

Identifiers

PMID31975292
OpenAlexW3000749762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.