ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Estimating total maximum isometric force output of trunk and hip muscles after spinal cord injury.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of coil orientation on corticospinal excitability of trunk muscles during postural and volitional tasks in healthy adults.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Stabilizing leaning postures with feedback controlled functional neuromuscular stimulation after trunk paralysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
- Facilitation of dependent transfers with functional neuromuscular stimulation: a computer simulation study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Characterization of the Force Production Capabilities of Paralyzed Trunk Muscles Activated With Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional neuromuscular stimulation (FNS) can be used to restore seated trunk function in individuals paralyzed due to spinal cord injury (SCI). Musculoskeletal models allow for the design and tuning of controllers for use with FNS; however, these models often use aggregated estimates for parameters of the musculotendon elements, the most significant of which is maximum isometric force (MIF). Stimulated MIF for individuals with SCI is typically assumed to be approximately 50% of the values exhibited by able-bodied muscles, which itself varies between studies and individuals. A method for estimating subject-specific MIF during dynamic motions in individuals with SCI produced by electrical stimulation has been developed to test this assumption and obtained more accurate estimates for biomechanical analysis and controller design. A simple on-off controller was applied to individuals with SCI seated in the workspace of a motion capture system to record joint angles of three types of trunk motions: forward flexion, left and right lateral bending followed by returning, un-aided, to upright posture via neural stimulation delivered to activate the muscles of the hips and trunk. System identification was used with a musculoskeletal model to find the optimal MIF values that reproduced the experimentally observed motions. Experiments with five volunteers with SCI indicate that an MIF of the 50% able-bodied values commonly used is significantly lower than the identified estimates in 33 of 44 muscle groups tested. This suggests that the strengths of paralyzed muscles when stimulated with FNS have been underestimated in many situations and their true force outputs may be higher than the values suggested for use in simulation studies with musculoskeletal models. These findings indicate that subject-specific musculoskeletal models can more closely mimic the motions of subjects by using individualized estimates of MIF, which may allow the design and tuning of controllers while reducing the time spent with subjects in the loop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.