Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974807›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology2020

Precision medicine in Parkinson's disease: emerging treatments for genetic Parkinson's disease.

Susanne A Schneider, Roy N Alcalay

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. International Genetic Testing and Counseling Practices for Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne A SchneiderDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. susanne.schneider@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Roy N AlcalayDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Medizinischen Fakultät, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München ...
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, numerous clinical trials for disease modification in Parkinson's disease (PD) have failed, possibly because of a "one-size-fits all" approach. Alternatively, a precision medicine approach, which customises treatments based on patients' individual genotype, may help reach disease modification. Here, we review clinical trials that target genetic forms of PD, i.e., GBA-associated and LRRK2-associated PD. In summary, six ongoing studies which explicitely recruit GBA-PD patients, and two studies which recruit LRRK2-PD patients, were identified. Available data on mechanisms of action, study design, and challenges of therapeutic trials are discussed.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGlucosylceramidaseHumansLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2Molecular Targeted TherapyMutationParkinson DiseasePrecision MedicineGBA protein, humanGlucosylceramidaseLeucine-Rich Repeat Serine-Threonine Protein Kinase-2LRRK2 protein, humanAmbroxolClinical trialGBAGenetic Parkinson’s diseaseKinase inhibitorLRRK2Small molecule compoundsSNCASuperprecision medicineTORC1 inhibitorVenglustat

Identifiers

PMID31974807
PMCPMC7035220
OpenAlexW3003022248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.