ReviewPlant cell reports2020
In vitro androgenesis: spontaneous vs. artificial genome doubling and characterization of regenerants.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- From pollen precursor to totipotent embryo: a model system for plant cell developmental plasticity.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Genotyping-by-Sequencing Reveals Marker-Based Genome Stability in Tetraploid Clementines for Triploid Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of in vitro-geranium (Pelargonium graveolens) plants affected by irradiation and chemical mutagens.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Advances in Genome Editing Through Haploid Induction Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- In vitro- and in vivo-based approaches for doubled haploid production in Zea mays L.: challenges and opportunities.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Oryzalin-induced polyploidy inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Recent Progress on Plant Apomixis for Genetic Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- First Gynogenesis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Tilianin content and morphological characterization of colchicine-induced autotetraploids inPeerJ · 2024Article
- A novel visual marker to distinguish haploids from doubled haploids in rice (Oryza sativa, L) at early growth stages.Plant methods · 2023Article
- Creation of Rice Doubled Haploids Resistant to Prolonged Flooding Using Anther Culture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Haploid Induction inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Protocol optimization and assessment of genotypic response for inbred line development through doubled haploid production in maize.BMC plant biology · 2023Article
- Article
- The Production ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Pollen Development and Viability in Diploid and Doubled Diploid Citrus Species.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Article
- Review
- Induction of Polyploidy and Metabolic Profiling in the Medicinal HerbPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Anther Culture of the Gametophytic Self-Incompatible Species Physalis ixocarpa Brot.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Androgenesis has become the most frequently chosen method of doubled haploid (DH) production in major crops. Theoretically, plantlets derived from in vitro cultured microspore encompass half of the normal chromosome number of donor plants and thus, considered to be haploid. However, depending on species/genotype and the method of haploid production, either via anther or isolated microspore culture, different ratios of spontaneous DHs and diploid (2n) or even polyploid plants originating from somatic tissues or unreduced gametes may also arise in the cultures. Adopting the method of haploid identification, anti-microtubular agent for restoring fertility, and discriminating spontaneous DHs from undesired heterozygote plants will substantially affect the success of androgenesis in breeding programs. The recent advances in the last 2 decades have made it possible to characterize the in vitro regenerants efficiently either prior to genome duplication or using in breeding programs. The herein described approaches and antimicotubular agents are, therefore, expected to improve the efficiency of DH-based breeding pipeline through the in vitro androgenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.