Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974732›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2020

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality: a prospective study.

Amra Jujić, Naeimeh Atabaki-Pasdar, Peter M Nilsson, Peter Almgren, Liisa Hakaste, Tiinamaija Tuomi, Lisa M Berglund, Paul W Franks, Jens J Holst, Rashmi B Prasad and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Polyagonists in Type 2 Diabetes Management.Current diabetes reports · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gut Molecules in Cardiometabolic Diseases: The Mechanisms behind the Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Amra JujićDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre, Hämtställe HS 36, Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-0158
Naeimeh Atabaki-PasdarDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter M NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Peter AlmgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Liisa HakasteFolkhälsan Research Centre, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiinamaija TuomiFolkhälsan Research Centre, Biomedicum, Helsinki, Finland.
Lisa M BerglundDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Paul W FranksDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Jens J HolstDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rashmi B PrasadDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Signe S TorekovDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susana RavassaProgram of Cardiovascular Diseases, CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier DíezProgram of Cardiovascular Diseases, CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Margaretha PerssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Olle MelanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Maria F GomezDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Leif GroopDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Emma AhlqvistDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Martin MagnussonDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Clinical Research Centre, Hämtställe HS 36, Box 50332, 202 13, Malmö, Sweden. martin.magnusson@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESMalmö University · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Helsinki · FIHarvard University · US

Funding

ALF government grants Dnr: 2012/1789European Commission FP7 Programme HOMAGE project grant HEALTH-2012-305507Hjärt-Lungfonden 20160872Instituto de Salud Carlos III RD12/0042/0009Suomen Akatemia FiDiPro grant 263401 and project grant 267882Vetenskapsrådet K2011- 65X-20 752- 04 - 6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisEvidence that glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) and/or the GIP receptor (GIPR) are involved in cardiovascular biology is emerging. We hypothesised that GIP has untoward effects on cardiovascular biology, in contrast to glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and therefore investigated the effects of GIP and GLP-1 concentrations on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk.

methodsGIP concentrations were successfully measured during OGTTs in two independent populations (Malmö Diet Cancer-Cardiovascular Cohort [MDC-CC] and Prevalence, Prediction and Prevention of Diabetes in Botnia [PPP-Botnia]) in a total of 8044 subjects. GLP-1 (n = 3625) was measured in MDC-CC. The incidence of CVD and mortality was assessed via national/regional registers or questionnaires. Further, a two-sample Mendelian randomisation (2SMR) analysis between the GIP pathway and outcomes (coronary artery disease [CAD] and myocardial infarction) was carried out using a GIP-associated genetic variant, rs1800437, as instrumental variable. An additional reverse 2SMR was performed with CAD as exposure variable and GIP as outcome variable, with the instrumental variables constructed from 114 known genetic risk variants for CAD.

resultsIn meta-analyses, higher fasting levels of GIP were associated with risk of higher total mortality (HR[95% CI] = 1.22 [1.11, 1.35]; p = 4.5 × 10 CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn two prospective, community-based studies, elevated levels of GIP were associated with greater risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality within 5-9 years of follow-up, whereas GLP-1 levels were not associated with excess risk. Further studies are warranted to determine the cardiovascular effects of GIP per se.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleGastric Inhibitory PolypeptideGenotypeGlucagon-Like Peptide 1GlucoseHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReceptors, Gastrointestinal HormoneGastric Inhibitory Polypeptidegastric inhibitory polypeptide receptorGlucagon-Like Peptide 1GlucoseReceptors, Gastrointestinal HormoneCardiovascularCardiovascular eventsCoronary artery diseaseGIPGLP-1Glucagon-like peptide 1Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptideMendelian randomisationMortality

Identifiers

PMID31974732
PMCPMC7145777
OpenAlexW3002179810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.