Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974724›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2020

The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and locoregional melanoma: a multicentre cohort study.

Alyss V Robinson, Claire Keeble, Michelle C I Lo, Owen Thornton, Howard Peach, Marc D S Moncrieff, Donald J Dewar, Ryckie G Wade

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Journal of oral pathology & medicine : official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyss V RobinsonLeeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-0730
Claire KeebleLeeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-8842
Michelle C I LoPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-9401
Owen ThorntonTrinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Howard PeachDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7520-0344
Marc D S MoncrieffPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4492-235X
Donald J DewarDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Ryckie G WadeLeeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. ryckiewade@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-6547
Leeds General Infirmary · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2018-11-ST2-028National Institute for Health Research DRF-2018-11-ST2-028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory biomarker which is useful in cancer prognostication. We aimed to investigate the differences in baseline NLR between patients with localised and metastatic cutaneous melanoma and how this biomarker changed over time with the recurrence of disease.

methodsThis multicentre cohort study describes patients treated for Stage I-III cutaneous melanoma over 10 years. The baseline NLR was measured immediately prior to surgery and again at the time of discharge or disease recurrence. The odds ratios (OR) for sentinel node involvement are estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression. The risk of recurrence is estimated using multivariable Cox regression.

resultsOverall 1489 individuals were included. The mean baseline NLR was higher in patients with palpable nodal disease compared to those with microscopic nodal or localised disease (2.8 versus 2.4 and 2.3, respectively; p < 0.001). A baseline NLR ≥ 2.3 was associated with 30% higher odds of microscopic metastatic melanoma in the sentinel lymph node [adjusted OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.3, 1.3)]. Following surgery, 253 patients (18.7%) developed recurrent melanoma during surveillance although there was no statistically significant association between the baseline NLR and the risk of recurrence [adjusted HR 0.9 (0.7, 1.1)].

conclusionThe NLR is associated with the volume of melanoma at presentation and may predict occult sentinel lymph metastases. Further prospective work is required to investigate how NLR may be modelled against other clinicopathological variables to predict outcomes and to understand the temporal changes in NLR following surgery for melanoma.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukocyte CountLymphatic MetastasisLymphocytesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNeutrophilsSkin NeoplasmsBiomarkerCutaneous melanomaLymphocyte–monocyte ratioNeutrophil–lymphocyte ratioPlatelet–lymphocyte ratioRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31974724
PMCPMC7113207
OpenAlexW3001578399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.