ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2020
A general method to generate artificial spike train populations matching recorded neurons.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating realistic neurophysiological time series with denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Synthetic Data Resource and Benchmarks for Time Cell Analysis and Detection Algorithms.eNeuro · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a general method to generate populations of artificial spike trains (ASTs) that match the statistics of recorded neurons. The method is based on computing a Gaussian local rate function of the recorded spike trains, which results in rate templates from which ASTs are drawn as gamma distributed processes with a refractory period. Multiple instances of spike trains can be sampled from the same rate templates. Importantly, we can manipulate rate-covariances between spike trains by performing simple algorithmic transformations on the rate templates, such as filtering or amplifying specific frequency bands, and adding behavior related rate modulations. The method was examined for accuracy and limitations using surrogate data such as sine wave rate templates, and was then verified for recorded spike trains from cerebellum and cerebral cortex. We found that ASTs generated with this method can closely follow the firing rate and local as well as global spike time variance and power spectrum. The method is primarily intended to generate well-controlled spike train populations as inputs for dynamic clamp studies or biophysically realistic multicompartmental models. Such inputs are essential to study detailed properties of synaptic integration with well-controlled input patterns that mimic the in vivo situation while allowing manipulation of input rate covariances at different time scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.