Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974705›Full record

ArticleThe journal of behavioral health services & research2020

Developing an Evidence-Based Technical Assistance Model: a Process Evaluation of the National Training and Technical Assistance Center for Child, Youth, and Family Mental Health.

Jonathan R Olson, Jennifer Schurer Coldiron, Ryan M Parigoris, Michelle D Zabel, Marlene Matarese, Eric J Bruns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of behavioral health services & research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Family-Focused Universal Substance Use Prevention in Primary Care: Advancing a Pragmatic National Healthcare Agenda.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Our Voice and Our Vote Are More Important Than Ever Before.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan R OlsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Building 29, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA. jro10@uw.edu.
Jennifer Schurer ColdironDepartment of Community and Human Services-King County, Chinook Building, 401 5th Ave Ste 500, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Ryan M ParigorisDepartment of Clinical Psychology, 100 William T. Morrissey Blvd, Boston, MA, 02125, USA.
Michelle D ZabelThe Institute for Innovation & Implementation, University of Maryland School of Social Work, 306 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Marlene MatareseThe Institute for Innovation & Implementation, University of Maryland School of Social Work, 306 West Redwood Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Eric J BrunsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Building 29, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.

Funding

Outcomes of the Wraparound Service ModelR34MH072759 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRUNS, ERIC J. · 2006 to 2008
$529k
WRAPAROUND FIDELITY ASSESSMENT SYSTEMR41MH077356 · NIMH · VROON VANDENBERG, LLP · PI BRUNS, ERIC J · 2007 to 2007
$126k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH072759NIMH NIH HHS R41 MH077356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Training and Technical Assistance Center for Child, Youth, and Family Mental Health (NTTAC) supports the development and implementation of systems of care (SOC) for youth with serious emotional disorders (SED) and their families. This article presents results from a process evaluation of NTTAC, conducted to support the Center's quality improvement and contribute to the knowledge base around provision of technical assistance (TA). The evaluation used a mixed methods approach with data collection focused on a defined subset of NTTAC TA recipients-recipients of federal Comprehensive Community Mental Health Services for Children SOC grants. Data sources included coded administrative records from SOC grant sites, administrative data from NTTAC, standardized measures of SOC development, and stakeholder survey data. Results indicate that TA dosage matched needs and goals of TA recipients (SOC sites), overall levels of satisfaction with TA were high, and TA content was generally aligned with need. TA recipients reported significant progress on indicators of SOC development over time. Together, these findings suggest that it is possible to develop TA methods that reflect the level and type of TA recipients' goals and needs, and, in turn, positively impact SOC development and behavioral health service delivery.

Indexed as

Family HealthMental HealthProfessional CompetenceAdolescentAdultChildCommunity Mental Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareEvidence-Based MedicineFamilyHumans

Identifiers

PMID31974705
PMCPMC7324420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.