Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974658›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Biomedical applications of electrical stimulation.

Siwei Zhao, Abijeet Singh Mehta, Min Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effects of home-based neurostimulation on outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Perspectives on the Therapeutic Effects of Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Beyond graphene: the MXene era in bioprinting.Biomedical engineering online · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Siwei ZhaoMary and Dick Holland Regenerative Medicine Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985965 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA. siwei.zhao@unmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-9968
Abijeet Singh MehtaDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-1716
Min ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2500-3035

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI W MARTIN USREY · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
Feasibility gamma stimulation to reduce beta-amyloid load across speciesR21AG060335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZANTO, THEODORE P, ZHAO, MIN · 2018 to 2019
$439k
Guiding angiogenesisR21EB015737 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2013 to 2014
$418k
Air Force Office of Scientific Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiatives (MURI) Grant FA9550-16-1-0052College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center Research Start-Up FundsNEI core P-30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS EY019101NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101NIA NIH HHS R21 AG060335NIA NIH HHS R21AG060335NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB015737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive overview on the biomedical applications of electrical stimulation (EStim). EStim has a wide range of direct effects on both biomolecules and cells. These effects have been exploited to facilitate proliferation and functional development of engineered tissue constructs for regenerative medicine applications. They have also been tested or used in clinics for pain mitigation, muscle rehabilitation, the treatment of motor/consciousness disorders, wound healing, and drug delivery. However, the research on fundamental mechanism of cellular response to EStim has fell behind its applications, which has hindered the full exploitation of the clinical potential of EStim. Moreover, despite the positive outcome from the in vitro and animal studies testing the efficacy of EStim, existing clinical trials failed to establish strong, conclusive supports for the therapeutic efficacy of EStim for most of the clinical applications mentioned above. Two potential directions of future research to improve the clinical utility of EStim are presented, including the optimization and standardization of the stimulation protocol and the development of more tissue-matching devices.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationPain ManagementRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell ProliferationHumansClinical trialElectrical stimulationIontophoresisOcular drug deliveryTissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID31974658
PMCPMC7954539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.