ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Resection of soft tissue tumours : Pitfalls, typical complications and prevention strategies].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical resection of a giant intramuscular lipoma of the biceps brachii: a case report and review of the literature.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Benign soft tissue lesions are 300 times as common as soft tissue sarcomas; hence, the likelihood of confusion is high. Lesions that are larger than 5 cm, deep, show infiltrative growth, or recur despite benign histology are suspicious for soft tissue sarcoma. The biopsy incision must be carefully chosen; in large lipomas, atypical lipomatous tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Lymphomas can be misdiagnosed and treated as undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. Vascular tumors and epithelioid lesions require more attention in histopathologic diagnostics and staging. Inflammatory lesions and aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumor) should also be borne in mind. In general, staging should be adapted to the underlying tumor biology. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant multimodal therapy must be discussed with the patient and used in a targeted manner. Superficial infiltrating sarcomas are prone to intralesional resection and may require intraoperative frozen section histology. If plastic reconstruction is necessary, a two-step procedure after proven tumor-free margins can be beneficial. Cavities and seromas, tight sutures, and closing the wound with clips are particularly critical. Wound drains at the thigh, pelvis, and groin should be left longer. Early revision in cases of hematoma or critical wound healing have proven beneficial. Adjuvant therapies are best planned before discharge from hospital. Overall, tumor-specific follow-up can significantly reduce the disadvantages of a recurrence resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31974631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.