ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Specific intraoperative and secondary complications of biological reconstructions following extralesional tumour resections of malignant bone tumours].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Autologous fibular transplantation for reconstruction of segmental bone defects].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe treatment of primary malignant bone tumours is interdisciplinary and individually adapted to the patient. Nowadays, limb salvage surgery is usually possible, and the subsequent reconstruction is carried out either by implantation of modular tumour megaprostheses or by biological reconstruction procedures. Special surgical and secondary complications have to be considered.
objectivesIndication and explanation of various biological reconstruction procedures and presentation of specific peri- and postoperative complications. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn adapted literature review and the contribution of our own therapy experiences and case studies for the presentation of biological reconstructions and their complication management was performed.
resultsIn biological reconstructions, autografts, allografts or a combination of autografts and allografts are used. Stabilization is achieved with screw and plate osteosyntheses. The most common secondary complications are pseudarthrosis, interponate fracture, graft necrosis and secondary malpositions.
conclusionIn selected cases, particularly at the upper extremities and in dia- or metaphyseal tumour sites, biological reconstruction after extralesional tumor resection is the surgical therapy of choice. The rate of long-term revision interventions is significantly lower compared to modular tumour megaprostheses. Biological reconstructions and the treatment of specific complications have to be performed in specialized centres for musculoskeletal surgical oncology/tumor orthopedics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.