ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Challenges to endoprosthetic reconstruction after tumor resection around the knee : Management of intra- and postoperative complications].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of complications of mega-implants following treatment of primary and periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremities.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe good functional outcomes of endoprosthetic knee reconstructions combined with modern oncosurgical concepts have resulted in a decreased rate of primary amputations following tumor resection in the region of the knee, thereby improving the quality of life of affected patients.
objectiveThis study aimed to reappraise complications which are more common than in conventional arthroplasties performed for arthritis or trauma due to the complexity of the surgical procedures, the size of the endoprosthetic reconstructions, and neo-/adjuvant therapies. MATERIAL AND
methodsPossible intra- and postoperative complications and treatment options are presented.
resultsTypical intraoperative complications include malalignment (axis, length, rotation) in implant positioning, unplanned soft tissue defects, impaired implant fixation due to poor bone stock, periprosthetic fractures, vessel/nerve injuries, and lesions/defects of the extensor mechanism. The relevant postoperative complication profile is characterized by local recurrences, periprosthetic infections, thromboembolic events, and mechanical failures (loosening, failure of the constraining mechanism).
conclusionDepending on anatomic conditions and the systemic oncological status of the patient, these complications represent tremendous challenges to reconstructive management. Knowledge of the potential problems enables them to be avoided. This requires profound experience in oncosurgery and tumor endoprosthesis revisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.