ArticleNucleic acids research2020
DNA-mediated coupling of ATPase, translocase and nuclease activities of a Type ISP restriction-modification enzyme.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biology of host-dependent restriction-modification in prokaryotes.EcoSal Plus · 2025Review
- Computational studies on the functional and structural impact of pathogenic mutations in enzymes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Review
- Mechanism of DNA cleavage by the endonuclease SauUSI: a major barrier to horizontal gene transfer and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymes involved in nucleic acid transactions often have a helicase-like ATPase coordinating and driving their functional activities, but our understanding of the mechanistic details of their coordination is limited. For example, DNA cleavage by the antiphage defense system Type ISP restriction-modification enzyme requires convergence of two such enzymes that are actively translocating on DNA powered by Superfamily 2 ATPases. The ATPase is activated when the enzyme recognizes a DNA target sequence. Here, we show that the activation is a two-stage process of partial ATPase stimulation upon recognition of the target sequence by the methyltransferase and the target recognition domains, and complete stimulation that additionally requires the DNA to interact with the ATPase domain. Mutagenesis revealed that a β-hairpin loop and motif V of the ATPase couples DNA translocation to ATP hydrolysis. Deletion of the loop inhibited translocation, while mutation of motif V slowed the rate of translocation. Both the mutations inhibited the double-strand (ds) DNA cleavage activity of the enzyme. However, a translocating motif V mutant cleaved dsDNA on encountering a translocating wild-type enzyme. Based on these results, we conclude that the ATPase-driven translocation not only brings two nucleases spatially close to catalyze dsDNA break, but that the rate of translocation influences dsDNA cleavage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.