Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974574›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2020

Uncovering tissue-specific binding features from differential deep learning.

Mike Phuycharoen, Peyman Zarrineh, Laure Bridoux, Shilu Amin, Marta Losa, Ke Chen, Nicoletta Bobola, Magnus Rattray

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Host-pathogen protein-nucleic acid interactions: A comprehensive review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mike PhuycharoenDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Peyman ZarrinehSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Laure BridouxSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Shilu AminSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Marta LosaDepartment of Orofacial Sciences and Department of Anatomy, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, HSW 740, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Ke ChenDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Nicoletta BobolaSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Magnus RattraySchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H018123/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N00907X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) can bind DNA in a cooperative manner, enabling a mutual increase in occupancy. Through this type of interaction, alternative binding sites can be preferentially bound in different tissues to regulate tissue-specific expression programmes. Recently, deep learning models have become state-of-the-art in various pattern analysis tasks, including applications in the field of genomics. We therefore investigate the application of convolutional neural network (CNN) models to the discovery of sequence features determining cooperative and differential TF binding across tissues. We analyse ChIP-seq data from MEIS, TFs which are broadly expressed across mouse branchial arches, and HOXA2, which is expressed in the second and more posterior branchial arches. By developing models predictive of MEIS differential binding in all three tissues, we are able to accurately predict HOXA2 co-binding sites. We evaluate transfer-like and multitask approaches to regularizing the high-dimensional classification task with a larger regression dataset, allowing for the creation of deeper and more accurate models. We test the performance of perturbation and gradient-based attribution methods in identifying the HOXA2 sites from differential MEIS data. Our results show that deep regularized models significantly outperform shallow CNNs as well as k-mer methods in the discovery of tissue-specific sites bound in vivo.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAnimalsBinding SitesBranchial RegionChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyEmbryo, MammalianGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomeodomain ProteinsMiceModels, GeneticMyeloid Ecotropic Viral Integration Site 1 ProteinOrgan SpecificityPoisson DistributionProtein BindingHomeodomain ProteinsHoxa2 protein, mouseMeis1 protein, mouseMyeloid Ecotropic Viral Integration Site 1 ProteinProtein IsoformsRNA

Identifiers

PMID31974574
PMCPMC7049686
OpenAlexW3002671441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.