Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974549›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2020

Symplasmic isolation marks cell fate changes during somatic embryogenesis.

Kamila Godel-Jedrychowska, Katarzyna Kulinska-Lukaszek, Anneke Horstman, Mercedes Soriano, Mengfan Li, Karol Malota, Kim Boutilier, Ewa U Kurczynska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Identification ofForestry research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcriptomes and DNA methylomes in apomictic cells delineate nucellar embryogenesis initiation in citrus.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kamila Godel-JedrychowskaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Katarzyna Kulinska-LukaszekInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
Anneke HorstmanBioscience, Wageningen University and Research, AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
Mercedes SorianoBioscience, Wageningen University and Research, AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
Mengfan LiBioscience, Wageningen University and Research, AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
Karol MalotaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in KatowiceKatowice, Poland.
Kim BoutilierBioscience, Wageningen University and Research, AA Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ewa U KurczynskaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
University of Silesia in Katowice · PLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-to-cell signalling is a major mechanism controlling plant morphogenesis. Transport of signalling molecules through plasmodesmata is one way in which plants promote or restrict intercellular signalling over short distances. Plasmodesmata are membrane-lined pores between cells that regulate the intercellular flow of signalling molecules through changes in their size, creating symplasmic fields of connected cells. Here we examine the role of plasmodesmata and symplasmic communication in the establishment of plant cell totipotency, using somatic embryo induction from Arabidopsis explants as a model system. Cell-to-cell communication was evaluated using fluorescent tracers, supplemented with histological and ultrastructural analysis, and correlated with expression of a WOX2 embryo reporter. We showed that embryogenic cells are isolated symplasmically from non-embryogenic cells regardless of the explant type (immature zygotic embryos or seedlings) and inducer system (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid or the BABY BOOM (BBM) transcription factor), but that the symplasmic domains in different explants differ with respect to the maximum size of molecule capable of moving through the plasmodesmata. Callose deposition in plasmodesmata preceded WOX2 expression in future sites of somatic embryo development, but later was greatly reduced in WOX2-expressing domains. Callose deposition was also associated with a decrease DR5 auxin response in embryogenic tissue. Treatment of explants with the callose biosynthesis inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose supressed somatic embryo formation in all three systems studied, and also blocked the observed decrease in DR5 expression. Together these data suggest that callose deposition at plasmodesmata is required for symplasmic isolation and establishment of cell totipotency in Arabidopsis.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsEmbryonic DevelopmentIndoleacetic AcidsPlasmodesmataArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic AcidsArabidopsisauxinBABY BOOMplasmodesmataplasmodesmata size exclusion limitsomatic embryogenesissymplasmic communicationsymplasmic domainWOX2

Identifiers

PMID31974549
PMCPMC7210756
OpenAlexW3002208620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.