Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974521›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

A normalized drug response metric improves accuracy and consistency of anticancer drug sensitivity quantification in cell-based screening.

Abhishekh Gupta, Prson Gautam, Krister Wennerberg, Tero Aittokallio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abhishekh Gupta *Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0212-3958
Prson Gautam *Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1154-8501
Krister WennerbergInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. krister.wennerberg@bric.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1352-4220
Tero AittokallioInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. tero.aittokallio@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-9769

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate quantification of drug effects is crucial for identifying pharmaceutically actionable cancer vulnerabilities. Current cell viability-based measurements often lead to biased response estimates due to varying growth rates and experimental artifacts that explain part of the inconsistency in high-throughput screening results. We developed an improved drug scoring model, normalized drug response (NDR), which makes use of both positive and negative control conditions to account for differences in cell growth rates, and experimental noise to better characterize drug-induced effects. We demonstrate an improved consistency and accuracy of NDR compared to existing metrics in assessing drug responses of cancer cells in various culture models and experimental setups. Notably, NDR reliably captures both toxicity and viability responses, and differentiates a wider spectrum of drug behavior, including lethal, growth-inhibitory and growth-stimulatory modes, based on a single viability readout. The method will therefore substantially reduce the time and resources required in cell-based drug sensitivity screening.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansReproducibility of ResultsSpectrum AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31974521
PMCPMC6978361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.