Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974429›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Diversity, compositional and functional differences between gut microbiota of children and adults.

Djawad Radjabzadeh, Cindy G Boer, Sanne A Beth, Pelle van der Wal, Jessica C Kiefte-De Jong, Michelle A E Jansen, Sergey R Konstantinov, Maikel P Peppelenbosch, John P Hays, Vincent W V Jaddoe and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Djawad RadjabzadehDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cindy G BoerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-0044
Sanne A BethDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pelle van der WalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-6456
Jessica C Kiefte-De JongDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michelle A E JansenDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sergey R KonstantinovDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maikel P PeppelenboschDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9112-6028
John P HaysDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent W V JaddoeThe Generation R Study, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2939-0041
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-8585
Fernando RivadeneiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9435-9441
Joyce B J van MeursDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
André G UitterlindenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7276-3387
Carolina Medina-GomezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7999-5538
Henriette A MollDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert KraaijDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.kraaij@erasmusmc.nl.
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota has been shown to play diverse roles in human health and disease although the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated. Large cohort studies can provide further understanding into inter-individual differences, with more precise characterization of the pathways by which the gut microbiota influences human physiology and disease processes. Here, we aimed to profile the stool microbiome of children and adults from two population-based cohort studies, comprising 2,111 children in the age-range of 9 to 12 years (the Generation R Study) and 1,427 adult individuals in the range of 46 to 88 years of age (the Rotterdam Study). For the two cohorts, 16S rRNA gene profile datasets derived from the Dutch population were generated. The comparison of the two cohorts showed that children had significantly lower gut microbiome diversity. Furthermore, we observed higher relative abundances of genus Bacteroides in children and higher relative abundances of genus Blautia in adults. Predicted functional metagenome analysis showed an overrepresentation of the glycan degradation pathways, riboflavin (vitamin B2), pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and folate (vitamin B9) biosynthesis pathways in children. In contrast, the gut microbiome of adults showed higher abundances of carbohydrate metabolism pathways, beta-lactam resistance, thiamine (vitamin B1) and pantothenic (vitamin B5) biosynthesis pathways. A predominance of catabolic pathways in children (valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation) as compared to biosynthetic pathways in adults (valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis) suggests a functional microbiome switch to the latter in adult individuals. Overall, we identified compositional and functional differences in gut microbiome between children and adults in a population-based setting. These microbiome profiles can serve as reference for future studies on specific human disease susceptibility in childhood, adulthood and specific diseased populations.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBacteriaBiosynthetic PathwaysChildFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMetagenomeMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUrban PopulationRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31974429
PMCPMC6978381
OpenAlexW3003072093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.