Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974342›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

A biphasic growth model for cell pole elongation in mycobacteria.

Mélanie T M Hannebelle, Joëlle X Y Ven, Chiara Toniolo, Haig A Eskandarian, Gaëlle Vuaridel-Thurre, John D McKinney, Georg E Fantner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The polar landscape of bacterial pathogens and predators.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tip extension and simultaneous multiple fission in a filamentous bacterium.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Types and functions of heterogeneity in mycobacteria.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mélanie T M HannebelleSchool of Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3769-1437
Joëlle X Y VenSchool of Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9690-9141
Chiara TonioloSchool of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2167-2936
Haig A EskandarianSchool of Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0610-0550
Gaëlle Vuaridel-ThurreSchool of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
John D McKinney *School of Life Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. john.mckinney@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0557-3479
Georg E Fantner *School of Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. georg.fantner@epfl.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5889-3022
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacteria grow by inserting new cell wall material in discrete zones at the cell poles. This pattern implies that polar growth zones must be assembled de novo at each division, but the mechanisms that control the initiation of new pole growth are unknown. Here, we combine time-lapse optical and atomic force microscopy to measure single-cell pole growth in mycobacteria with nanometer-scale precision. We show that single-cell growth is biphasic due to a lag phase of variable duration before the new pole transitions from slow to fast growth. This transition and cell division are independent events. The difference between the lag and interdivision times determines the degree of single-cell growth asymmetry, which is high in fast-growing species and low in slow-growing species. We propose a biphasic growth model that is distinct from previous unipolar and bipolar models and resembles "new end take off" (NETO) dynamics of polar growth in fission yeast.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalBacterial ProteinsCell DivisionLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceMycobacteriumSpatio-Temporal AnalysisTime-Lapse ImagingBacterial ProteinsDendra2 protein, DendronephthyaLuminescent ProteinsWag31 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID31974342
PMCPMC6978421
OpenAlexW3002140572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.