Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974311›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Genome-scale transcriptional dynamics and environmental biosensing.

Garrett Graham, Nicholas Csicsery, Elizabeth Stasiowski, Gregoire Thouvenin, William H Mather, Michael Ferry, Scott Cookson, Jeff Hasty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sensory Systems and Transcriptional Regulation inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Genome-scale transcriptional dynamics and environmental biosensing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Deep learning models in genomics; are we there yet?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Garrett GrahamDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Nicholas CsicseryDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Elizabeth StasiowskiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
Gregoire ThouveninDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093.
William H MatherQuantitative BioSciences, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
Michael FerryQuantitative BioSciences, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
Scott CooksonQuantitative BioSciences, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
Jeff HastyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; hasty@bioeng.ucsd.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale technologies have enabled mapping of the complex molecular networks that govern cellular behavior. An emerging theme in the analyses of these networks is that cells use many layers of regulatory feedback to constantly assess and precisely react to their environment. The importance of complex feedback in controlling the real-time response to external stimuli has led to a need for the next generation of cell-based technologies that enable both the collection and analysis of high-throughput temporal data. Toward this end, we have developed a microfluidic platform capable of monitoring temporal gene expression from over 2,000 promoters. By coupling the "Dynomics" platform with deep neural network (DNN) and associated explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) algorithms, we show how machine learning can be harnessed to assess patterns in transcriptional data on a genome scale and identify which genes contribute to these patterns. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of the Dynomics platform as a field-deployable real-time biosensor through prediction of the presence of heavy metals in urban water and mine spill samples, based on the the dynamic transcription profiles of 1,807 unique

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringGene Expression ProfilingMachine LearningBiosensing TechniquesDatabases, GeneticEquipment DesignEscherichia coliGenes, BacterialGenomicsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysMetals, HeavyMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscriptomeMetals, HeavybiosensordynamicsE. coli transcriptomicsexplainable AIhigh-throughput microfluidics

Identifiers

PMID31974311
PMCPMC7022183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.