Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974208›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory.

Erik A Wing, Benjamin R Geib, Wei-Chun Wang, Zachary Monge, Simon W Davis, Roberto Cabeza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Representational formats of human memory traces.Brain structure & function · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Understanding associative false memories in aging using multivariate analyses.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik A WingCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, ewing@research.baycrest.org.
Benjamin R GeibCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Wei-Chun WangCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.
Zachary MongeCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.ORCID 0000-0002-5166-5438
Simon W DavisDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina 27708.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-0756
Roberto CabezaCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708.

Funding

Effects of Aging on Visual Memory: Neuroimaging StudiesR01AG019731 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CABEZA, ROBERTO · 2002 to 2017
$4.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG019731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The declarative memory system allows us to accurately recognize a countless number of items and events, particularly those strengthened by repeated exposure. However, increased familiarity due to repetition can also lead to false recognition of related but new items, particularly when mechanisms supporting fine-grain mnemonic discrimination fail. The hippocampus is thought to be particularly important in separating overlapping cortical inputs during encoding so that similar experiences can be differentiated. In the current study of male and female human subjects, we examine how neural pattern similarity between repeated exemplars of a given concept (e.g., apple) influences true and false memory for target or lure images. Consistent with past work, we found that subsequent true recognition was related to pattern similarity between concept exemplars and the entire encoding set (global encoding similarity), particularly in ventral visual stream. In addition, memory for an individual target exemplar (a specific apple) could be predicted solely by the degree of pattern overlap between the other exemplars (different apple pictures) of that concept (concept-specific encoding similarity). Critically, subsequent false memory for lures was mitigated when high concept-specific similarity in cortical areas was accompanied by differentiated hippocampal representations of the corresponding exemplars. Furthermore, both true and false memory entailed the reinstatement of concept-related information at varying levels of specificity. These results link both true and false memory to a measure of concept strength expressed in the overlap of cortical representations, and importantly, illustrate how the hippocampus serves to separate concurrent cortical overlap in the service of detailed memory.

Indexed as

Repression, PsychologyAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMental RecallPattern Recognition, PhysiologicalPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyVisual PathwaysYoung Adultencodingfalse memoryfMRIhippocampusrecognitionrepresentational similarity analysis

Identifiers

PMID31974208
PMCPMC7046457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.