Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974195›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2021

Predicting sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with the EASIX biomarker panel.

Sihe Jiang, Olaf Penack, Tobias Terzer, David Schult, Joshua Majer-Lauterbach, Aleksandar Radujkovic, Igor W Blau, Lars Bullinger, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Peter Dreger and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sihe JiangCharité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin,Germany.
Olaf PenackCharité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin,Germany.
Tobias TerzerBiostatistics, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany.
David SchultMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joshua Majer-LauterbachMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Aleksandar RadujkovicMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Igor W BlauCharité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin,Germany.
Lars BullingerCharité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Berlin,Germany.
Carsten Müller-TidowMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter DregerMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas LuftMedicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No biomarker panel is established for prediction of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD), a major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We compared the potential of the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), based on lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and thrombocytes, with that of the SOS/VOD CIBMTR clinical risk score to predict SOS/VOD in two independent cohorts. In a third cohort, we studied the impact of endothelium-active prophylaxis with pravastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDA) on SOS/VOD risk. The cumulative incidence of SOS/VOD within 28 days after alloSCT in the training cohort (Berlin, 2013-2015, n=446) and in the validation cohort (Heidelberg, 2002-2009, n=380) was 9.6% and 8.4%, respectively. In both cohorts, EASIX assessed at the day of alloSCT (EASIX-d0) was significantly associated with SOS/VOD incidence (p<0.0001), overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). In contrast, the CIBMTR score showed no statistically significant association with SOS/VOD incidence, and did not predict OS and NRM. In patients receiving pravastatin/UDA, the cumulative incidence of SOS/VOD was significantly lower at 1.7% (p<0.0001, Heidelberg, 2010-2015, n=359) than in the two cohorts not receiving pravastatin/UDA. The protective effect was most pronounced in patients with high EASIX-d0. The cumulative SOS/VOD incidence in the highest EASIX-d0 quartiles were 18.1% and 16.8% in both cohorts without endothelial prophylaxis as compared to 2.2% in patients with pravastatin/UDA prophylaxis (p<0.0001). EASIX-d0 is the first validated biomarker for defining a subpopulation of alloSCT recipients at high risk for SOS/VOD. Statin/UDA endothelial prophylaxis could constitute a prophylactic measure for patients at increased SOS/VOD risk.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHepatic Veno-Occlusive DiseaseBiomarkersEndotheliumHumansRisk FactorsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31974195
PMCPMC7849560
OpenAlexW3002223788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.