Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974126›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2020

Methods to Visualize Elements in Plants.

Peter M Kopittke, Enzo Lombi, Antony van der Ent, Peng Wang, Jamie S Laird, Katie L Moore, Daniel P Persson, Søren Husted

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Translocation of Foliar Absorbed Zn in Sunflower (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Peter M KopittkeUniversity of Queensland, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4948-1880
Enzo LombiUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, Mawson Lakes, South Australia 5095, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3384-0375
Antony van der EntUniversity of Queensland, Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-5065
Peng WangNanjing Agricultural University, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing 210095, China p.wang3@njau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-8767
Jamie S LairdUniversity of Melbourne, School of Physics, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4981-975X
Katie L MooreUniversity of Manchester, School of Materials, Photon Science Institute, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1615-7232
Daniel P PerssonUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences and Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-190X
Søren HustedUniversity of Copenhagen, Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences and Copenhagen Plant Science Centre, 1871 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-1902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the distribution of elements in plants is important for researchers across a broad range of fields, including plant molecular biology, agronomy, plant physiology, plant nutrition, and ionomics. However, it is often challenging to evaluate the applicability of the wide range of techniques available, with each having its own strengths and limitations. Here, we compare scanning/transmission electron microscopy-based energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, x-ray fluorescence microscopy, particle-induced x-ray emission, laser ablation inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, nanoscale secondary ion mass spectroscopy, autoradiography, and confocal microscopy with fluorophores. For these various techniques, we compare their accessibility, their ability to analyze hydrated tissues (without sample preparation) and suitability for in vivo analyses, as well as examining their most important analytical merits, such as resolution, sensitivity, depth of analysis, and the range of elements that can be analyzed. We hope that this information will assist other researchers to select, access, and evaluate the approach that is most useful in their particular research program or application.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, ElectronPlantsSpectrometry, X-Ray Emission

Identifiers

PMID31974126
PMCPMC7140966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.