Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974097›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2020

Multi-trait Genomic Prediction Model Increased the Predictive Ability for Agronomic and Malting Quality Traits in Barley (

Madhav Bhatta, Lucia Gutierrez, Lorena Cammarota, Fernanda Cardozo, Silvia Germán, Blanca Gómez-Guerrero, María Fernanda Pardo, Valeria Lanaro, Mercedes Sayas, Ariel J Castro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-trait ridge regression BLUP withFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Madhav BhattaDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., WI, 53706.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-0481
Lucia GutierrezDepartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., WI, 53706, gutierrezcha@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2957-3086
Lorena CammarotaDepartment of plant production, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3, Km363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay.
Fernanda CardozoMaltería Uruguay S.A. Ruta 55, Km26, Ombúes de Lavalle, Uruguay.
Silvia GermánInstituto Nacional de Investigación Agropuecuaria, Estación Experimental La Estanzuela, Ruta 50, Km11, Colonia, Uruguay.
Blanca Gómez-GuerreroLatitud, LATU Foundation, Av Italia 6201, Montevideo 11500, Uruguay, and.
María Fernanda PardoMaltería Oriental S.A., Camino Abrevadero 5525, Montevideo 12400, Uruguay.
Valeria LanaroLatitud, LATU Foundation, Av Italia 6201, Montevideo 11500, Uruguay, and.
Mercedes SayasMaltería Oriental S.A., Camino Abrevadero 5525, Montevideo 12400, Uruguay.
Ariel J CastroDepartment of plant production, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3, Km363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant breeders regularly evaluate multiple traits across multiple environments, which opens an avenue for using multiple traits in genomic prediction models. We assessed the potential of multi-trait (MT) genomic prediction model through evaluating several strategies of incorporating multiple traits (eight agronomic and malting quality traits) into the prediction models with two cross-validation schemes (CV1, predicting new lines with genotypic information only and CV2, predicting partially phenotyped lines using both genotypic and phenotypic information from correlated traits) in barley. The predictive ability was similar for single (ST-CV1) and multi-trait (MT-CV1) models to predict new lines. However, the predictive ability for agronomic traits was considerably increased when partially phenotyped lines (MT-CV2) were used. The predictive ability for grain yield using the MT-CV2 model with other agronomic traits resulted in 57% and 61% higher predictive ability than ST-CV1 and MT-CV1 models, respectively. Therefore, complex traits such as grain yield are better predicted when correlated traits are used. Similarly, a considerable increase in the predictive ability of malting quality traits was observed when correlated traits were used. The predictive ability for grain protein content using the MT-CV2 model with both agronomic and malting traits resulted in a 76% higher predictive ability than ST-CV1 and MT-CV1 models. Additionally, the higher predictive ability for new environments was obtained for all traits using the MT-CV2 model compared to the MT-CV1 model. This study showed the potential of improving the genomic prediction of complex traits by incorporating the information from multiple traits (cost-friendly and easy to measure traits) collected throughout breeding programs which could assist in speeding up breeding cycles.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceDNA, PlantGenomicsGenotypeHordeumPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, Plantgenomic predictionGenomic PredictionGenPredgrain yield, grain qualitymalting qualitymulti-environmentMulti-traitShared Data Resources

Identifiers

PMID31974097
PMCPMC7056970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.