Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974092›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

What does integrated care mean from an older person's perspective? A scoping review.

Michael T Lawless, Amy Marshall, Manasi Murthy Mittinty, Gillian Harvey

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What Is Important to Older People When Accessing Urgent Health Care: Key Considerations and Recommendations From Consumer Consultations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael T LawlessCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia michael.lawless@flinders.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-6442
Amy MarshallAdelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Manasi Murthy MittintyPain Management Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2792-2799
Gillian HarveyAdelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically map and synthesise the literature on older adults' perceptions and experiences of integrated care.

settingVarious healthcare settings, including primary care, hospitals, allied health practices and emergency departments.

participantsAdults aged ≥60 years.

interventionsIntegrated (or similarly coordinated) healthcare. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Using scoping review methodology, four electronic databases (EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses) and the grey literature (Open Grey and Google Scholar) were searched to identify studies reporting on older adults' experiences of integrated care. Studies reporting on empirical, interpretive and critical research using any type of methodology were included. Four independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and analysis.

resultsThe initial search retrieved 436 articles, of which 30 were included in this review. Patients expressed a desire for continuity, both in terms of care relationships and management, seamless transitions between care services and/or settings, and coordinated care that delivers quick access, effective treatment, self-care support, respect for patient preferences, and involves carers and families.

conclusionsParticipants across the studies desired accessible, efficient and coordinated care that caters to their needs and preferences, while keeping in mind their rights and safety. This review highlights the salience of the relational, informational and organisational aspects of care from an older person's perspective. Findings are transferable and could be applied in various healthcare settings to derive patient-centred success measures that reflect the aspects of integrated care that are deemed important to older adults and their supporters.

Indexed as

HospitalsAgedDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansPatient PreferencePrimary Health Caregeriatric medicineorganisation of health servicesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID31974092
PMCPMC7044957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.