Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974072›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Psychiatry2020

Risk of self-harm after the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders in Hong Kong, 2000-10: a nested case-control study.

Yi Chai, Hao Luo, Gloria H Y Wong, Jennifer Y M Tang, Tai-Chung Lam, Ian C K Wong, Paul S F Yip

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Individual- and population-level associations of mental disorders with intentional self-harm.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Yi ChaiDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Hao LuoDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Hong Kong Jockey Club Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Department of Computer Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Electronic address: haoluo@hku.hk.
Gloria H Y WongDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Sau Po Centre on Ageing, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Department of Psychiatry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jennifer Y M TangSau Po Centre on Ageing, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Tai-Chung LamDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Ian C K WongDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Paul S F YipDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; Hong Kong Jockey Club Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Jockey Club · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychiatric disorders are established risk factors for self-harm. However, variation in the risk of self-harm by specific psychiatric disorder and stratified by gender and age is rarely examined in population-representative samples. This study aimed to investigate the risk of self-harm following diagnosis of different psychiatric disorders in an Asian population, through a review of inpatient records retrieved from the Hong Kong Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS).

methodsFor this nested case-control study, the inpatient data of people admitted for any reason to Hong Kong public hospitals, between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2010, were extracted from CDARS. Cases were people aged 10 years or older who had been admitted to inpatient care with a first-listed record of psychiatric disorder during the study period. The seven psychiatric disorders of interest were: depression, alcohol misuse or dependence, personality disorders, bipolar disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and substance misuse or dependence. Two control patients were matched per case from a subsample of all individuals with the same gender, age, and admission time (ie, same calendar year and month), who did not have any record of the psychiatric disorders of interest. Any patients with a history of self-harm diagnosis before, or at the same time as, the first diagnosis of psychiatric disorder (cases) or admission (controls), were excluded. For each diagnostic category, a Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (HR; plus 95% CIs) of associated self-harm, adjusting for gender, age, control-matched admission time, 20 districts of residence, physical comorbidities established as risk factors for self-harm (diabetes, asthma, migraine, epilepsy, HIV, and cancer), and presence of the six other psychiatric disorders. We repeated this analysis in subgroups stratified by gender (male and female) and by age (adolescent, 10-24 years; young adult, 25-44 years; middle-aged, 45-64 years; and older people, ≥65 years).

findingsBetween 2000 and 2010, we followed up a cohort of 86 353 people with a first-recorded diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder of interest, and 134 857 matched controls. The highest risk of self-harm was observed in patients with substance misuse or dependence (adjusted HR vs matched controls, 9·6 [95% CI 8·4-11·0]), followed by those with personality disorders (3·7 [2·8-4·9]) and alcohol misuse or dependence (3·2 [2·9-3·7]). When stratified by gender and age, the highest risk of self-harm behaviour was found in the substance misuse or dependence group for both genders (for female patients: adjusted HR vs matched controls, 7·7 [6·0-9·8]; and for male patients, 10·5 [8·9-12·4]), and for all age groups (adolescent: 9·6 [7·2-12·7]; young adults: 10·2 [8·4-12·3]; middle-aged: 11·2 [8·0-15·6], and older people: 3·2 [1·7-6·1]).

interpretationFirst-recorded diagnoses of psychiatric disorders were significantly associated with an elevated risk of subsequent self-harm. The associations varied considerably by diagnostic categories across gender and age subgroups. Our findings highlight the need to develop more efficient and targeted preventive measures in psychiatric care management, with specific attention to demographic characteristics linked to increased risk within the same diagnostic category.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnxiety DisordersBipolar DisorderCase-Control StudiesChildDepressive DisorderFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHong KongHospitals, PublicHumansInpatientsMale

Identifiers

PMID31974072
OpenAlexW2999812946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.