Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31974014›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2020

Availability of Confidential Services for Teens Declined After the 2011-2013 Changes to Publicly Funded Family Planning Programs in Texas.

Kate Coleman-Minahan, Kristine Hopkins, Kari White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Barriers to contraception access and use among youth: A scoping review in high-income countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Minors' Experiences Accessing Confidential Contraception in Texas.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate Coleman-MinahanCollege of Nursing, Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado; University of Colorado Population Center (CUPC), University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado. Electronic address: kate.coleman-minahan@cuanschutz.edu.
Kristine HopkinsPopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Kari WhitePopulation Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.

Funding

Scientific & Technical CoreP2CHD042849 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Elizabeth T. Gershoff · 2017 to 2026
$5.2M
University of Colorado Population CenterP2CHD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI JANE A MENKEN · 2015 to 2026
$3.7M
The University of Colorado Population CenterR24HD066613 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI PAMPEL, FRED C · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042849NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD066613NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD066613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTexas is one of 24 states that does not explicitly allow minors to consent to contraception. We explore changes in the provision of confidential reproductive health services after the implementation of state policies that cut and reorganized public family planning funding, including Title X.

methodsWe use data from 3 waves of in-depth interviews, conducted between February 2012 and February 2015, with program administrators at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas about changes in service delivery. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts from 47 organizations with segments related to the provision of services to minor teens.

resultsOverall, 34 of the 47 organizations received Title X funding before 2013, and 79% lost this funding during the study period. Respondents at these organizations frequently reported a decrease in teen clients, which they attributed to loss of confidential services previously guaranteed under Title X. As the number of Title X-funded sites decreased, availability of confidential services became inconsistent. Most organizations offered confidential testing for pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, but availability of confidential contraceptive services varied across and within organizations and often depended on insurance coverage. Respondents also reported challenges clarifying parental consent requirements after the changes in Title X and state funding.

conclusionsLoss of Title X funding decreased availability of quality family planning services for teens and burdened organizations. As the new Title X regulations are implemented, family planning organizations' experiences in Texas foreshadow what might occur nationally, particularly in states that do not allow minors to consent for contraception.

Indexed as

ContraceptionFamily Planning ServicesAdolescentFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoveragePregnancySex EducationTexasUnited StatesAdolescentsContraceptionHealth care accessHealth policy

Identifiers

PMID31974014
PMCPMC7263963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.