ArticleBMC health services research2020
Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06799936 (A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference-sensitivity and personal motives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Exploring Pathways to Optimise Care in malignant bowel obstruction (EPOC): A realist review of shared decision-making with people with advanced cancer and severe symptoms.Palliative medicine · 2026Review
- Perceptions of the Values and Outcomes to Improve Cancer Experiences (VOICE) tool: a digital values-clarification instrument and tailored summary report for older adults with advanced cancer.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Children's Healthcare by Parents' Immigrant Status: Findings from the 2021-2022 U.S. National Survey of Children's Health.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Mixed methods realist evaluation of a co-designed intervention to promote shared decision-making with frail older adults, planning discharge from hospital: a protocol.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the patient participation scale.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Facilitators and Barriers to Shared Decision-Making Communication Between Latina Mothers and Pediatric Mental Healthcare Providers.Health communication · 2025Article
- Mechanism Assessment of Physician Discourse Strategies and Patient Consultation Behaviors on Online Health Platforms: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Approaches That Simplify Implementation of Complex Interventions in Healthcare System Change: "Scoping Review".Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Perceived usability and acceptability of the My-Hip Fracture risk communication tool from the perspective of academic clinicians.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Article
- Pharmaceutical public health competencies for Thai pharmacists: A scoping review with expert consultation.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Shared Decision-Making Training in Family Medicine Residency: A Scoping Review.Korean journal of family medicine · 2024Article
- Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024Article
- Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the ReadyHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Review
- Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives.Family practice · 2024Observational
- Barriers to gene therapy, understanding the concerns people with haemophilia have: an exigency sub-study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundShared Decision-making (SDM), a medical decision-making model, was popularized in the late 1980s in reaction to then predominate paternalistic decision-making, aiming to better meet the needs of patients. Extensive research has been conducted internationally examining the benefits of SDM implementation; however, existing theory on how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why is limited. While literature has shown positive patient, health care provider, and system benefits (SDM outputs), further research is required to understand the nuances of this type of decision-making. As such, we set out to address: "In which situations, how, why, and for whom does SDM between patients and health care providers contribute to improved engagement in the Shared Decision-making process?"
methodsTo achieve our study goals we conducted a seven-step realist synthesis process, which included: (1) preliminary program theory development, (2) search strategy development, (3) selection and appraisal of literature in accordance with realist methodology, (4) data extraction, (5) identification of relevant formal theories, (6) data analysis and synthesis, and (7) formation of a revised program theory with the input of stakeholders. This process was done in accordance with RAMESES guidelines and publication standards for a realist synthesis. Expert consultations were also held to ensure consistency within the SDM literature.
resultsThrough our realist synthesis, we developed a program theory of SDM which includes three contexts (pre-existing relationship, difficulty of decision, and system support), eight mechanism sets (anxiety, trust, perception of other party capacity, perception of time, self-efficacy, world view, perception of capacity to external support, and recognition of decision), and one outcome (engagement in SDM).
conclusionsAs far as the authors of this paper are aware, this paper is the first to begin unpacking how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why. By examining key mechanism sets and exploring how they facilitate or inhibit SDM, we have produced a program theory that may assist health care professionals, policy makers, and patients. While further research is suggested to further unpack the concepts identified within this paper, this provides an initial understanding into the theory behind SDM. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42017062609.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.