Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31973754›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis.

Tamara Waldron, Tracey Carr, Linda McMullen, Gill Westhorp, Vicky Duncan, Shelley-May Neufeld, Lori-Ann Bandura, Gary Groot

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06799936 (A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06799936 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Communication-Priming Intervention to Improve Shared Decision-Making Between Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Clinicians: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2025 to 2027Enrolled280ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5Arms"CKD Jumpstart- Tips" priming intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  17. Patient readiness for shared decision making about treatment: Conceptualisation and development of the ReadyHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tamara WaldronDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Tracey CarrDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Linda McMullenDepartment of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan Arts, 154, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A5, Canada.
Gill WesthorpCharles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia.
Vicky DuncanDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Shelley-May NeufeldDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Lori-Ann BanduraDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
Gary GrootDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Health Sciences Building, 107 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada. gary.groot@usask.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared Decision-making (SDM), a medical decision-making model, was popularized in the late 1980s in reaction to then predominate paternalistic decision-making, aiming to better meet the needs of patients. Extensive research has been conducted internationally examining the benefits of SDM implementation; however, existing theory on how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why is limited. While literature has shown positive patient, health care provider, and system benefits (SDM outputs), further research is required to understand the nuances of this type of decision-making. As such, we set out to address: "In which situations, how, why, and for whom does SDM between patients and health care providers contribute to improved engagement in the Shared Decision-making process?"

methodsTo achieve our study goals we conducted a seven-step realist synthesis process, which included: (1) preliminary program theory development, (2) search strategy development, (3) selection and appraisal of literature in accordance with realist methodology, (4) data extraction, (5) identification of relevant formal theories, (6) data analysis and synthesis, and (7) formation of a revised program theory with the input of stakeholders. This process was done in accordance with RAMESES guidelines and publication standards for a realist synthesis. Expert consultations were also held to ensure consistency within the SDM literature.

resultsThrough our realist synthesis, we developed a program theory of SDM which includes three contexts (pre-existing relationship, difficulty of decision, and system support), eight mechanism sets (anxiety, trust, perception of other party capacity, perception of time, self-efficacy, world view, perception of capacity to external support, and recognition of decision), and one outcome (engagement in SDM).

conclusionsAs far as the authors of this paper are aware, this paper is the first to begin unpacking how SDM works, for whom, in which circumstances, and why. By examining key mechanism sets and exploring how they facilitate or inhibit SDM, we have produced a program theory that may assist health care professionals, policy makers, and patients. While further research is suggested to further unpack the concepts identified within this paper, this provides an initial understanding into the theory behind SDM. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42017062609.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPsychological TheoryHealth PersonnelHumansPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient Relations(3–10 words): shared decision makingHealth systemsMechanismsMedical decision makingQuality improvementRealist review

Identifiers

PMID31973754
PMCPMC6979294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.