Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31973751›Full record

SynthesisCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2020

PSMA PET for primary lymph node staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer: an expedited systematic review.

Lars J Petersen, Helle D Zacho

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) multi-center prospective phase 1/2European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Trial
  2. Imaging Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  3. Recent Advances in Musculoskeletal Radiology: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Application.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Use ofWiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Article
  7. Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison ofJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A randomised trial of [BJUI compass · 2023
    Article
  18. Development and external validation of a multivariable [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars J PetersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark. lajp@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-983X
Helle D ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aalborg University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPSMA PET is a promising method for primary lymph node staging in prostate cancer. However, recent systematic reviews have identified only a limited number of studies with histopathology as a reference test.

methodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. An expedited systematic review was performed where we identified diagnostic studies in prostate cancer where a preoperative PSMA PET for primary lymph node staging was compared to histopathology. The trials must have diagnostic data on a patient level.

resultsEighteen eligible clinical trials included 969 patients. The median patient number per study was 32 (range 10 to 208). Five trials were prospective, and nine trials had a consecutive enrolment of patients. Sixteen studies used Ga-68-PSMA-11; there was one study with Cu-64-PSMA and one study with F-18-DCDFPyL. Twelve studies used PET/CT, four trials used PET/MR. Most trials included patients with intermediate and high-risk. Diagnostic accuracy varied notably among the studies; sensitivity ranged from 23 to 100%, specificity 67-100%, positive predictive value 20-100%, and negative predictive value 41-100%. Weighted sensitivity was 59%, weighted specificity was 93%. Four studies compared PSMA PET with anatomical imaging (CT or MRI); in all cases, sensitivity and specificity were superior with PSMA PET. Three studies compared PSMA PET with multi-parametric or diffusion-weighted MRI with mixed results.

conclusionsPSMA PET showed promising diagnostic accuracy for primary lymph node staging with pathology as reference. Recommendation for PSMA PET for high-risk patients in clinical guidelines should be supported by confirmatory, prospective trials with patient-relevant outcomes.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIDiagnostic accuracyLymph node metastasisPositron emission tomographyProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigenStaging

Identifiers

PMID31973751
PMCPMC6979382
OpenAlexW3001423983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.