Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31973747›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2020

Testing a method of sampling for entomological determination of transmission of Wuchereria bancrofti to inform lymphatic filariasis treatment strategy in urban settings.

Rogers Nditanchou, Ruth Dixon, Dung Pam, Sunday Isiyaku, Christian Nwosu, Safiya Sanda, Elena Schmidt, Benjamin Koudou, David Molyneux

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rogers NditanchouPolicy & Programme Strategy, Sightsavers, Cameroon Country Office, BP 4484, Bastos, Yaoundé, Cameroon. rnditanchou@sightsavers.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-4608
Ruth DixonPolicy & Programme Strategy, Sightsavers, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 3BW, UK.
Dung PamDepartment of Zoology, University of Jos, Bauchi Road, 2084, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.
Sunday IsiyakuSightsavers, Nigeria Country Office, 1 Golf Course Road, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Christian NwosuSightsavers, Nigeria Country Office, 1 Golf Course Road, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Safiya SandaSightsavers, Nigeria Country Office, 1 Golf Course Road, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria.
Elena SchmidtPolicy & Programme Strategy, Sightsavers, 35 Perrymount Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, RH16 3BW, UK.
Benjamin KoudouLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Pl, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
David MolyneuxLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Pl, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is on-going debate about scale-up of lymphatic filariasis treatment to include urban areas. Determining Wuchereria bancrofti transmission is more complex in these settings and entomological methodologies suggested as a solution as yet have no clear guidance.

methodsThe study was conducted in six communities in Minna and Kaduna cities in Nigeria selected based on pre-disposing risk factors for mosquitoes and Transmission Assessment Survey (TAS) results in 2016 indicating need for treatment (> 1% prevalence). In each community, 4 gravid traps (GT), 15 exit traps (ET) and 21 pyrethrum spray catches (PSC) were used for 5 months targeting a sample size of 10,000 mosquitoes inclusive of at least 1500 Anopheles. Community researchers were selected and trained to facilitate community acceptability and carry out collection. We have evaluated the mosquito sampling and trapping methodology in terms of success at reaching targeted sample size, cost effectiveness, and applicability.

resultsCommunity researchers were influential in enabling high acceptability of the methods of collection and were able to conduct collections independently. Overall, 12.1% of trapping events (one trapping event corresponds to one visit to one trap to collect mosquitoes) were affected by householder actions, weather conditions or trap malfunction leading to lower than optimal catches. Exit traps were the most cost-effective way to catch Anopheles (6.4 USD per trapping event and 12.8 USD per Anopheles caught). Sample size of 10,000 mosquitoes overall in each city was met though Anopheles catch was insufficient in one city. However, sample size was met only in one implementation unit out of the four.

conclusionsMethods need adapting to maximise Anopheles catch: we propose planning 250 gravid trap and 3724 exit trap trapping events in similar settings in West African urban areas where Culex is dominant, not using pyrethrum spray catches, and weighting trapping events later in the rainy season. Planning should increase involvement of community researchers, incorporate null catches and participants' actions to predict catches. Importantly, evaluation units should be analogous with implementation units, the units at which treatment decisions will be made in the urban context.

Indexed as

Wuchereria bancroftiAnimalsAnophelesCulexElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleHumansMaleMosquito VectorsNeglected DiseasesNigeriaUrban HealthLymphatic filariasisMosquitoesTransmissionUrban areasWuchereria bancrofti

Identifiers

PMID31973747
PMCPMC6979341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.