Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31973734›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Evaluation of DawaPlus 3.0 and DawaPlus 4.0, deltamethrin-PBO combination nets against pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles culicifacies in experimental huts in India.

Kasinathan Gunasekaran, Sudhansu Sekhar Sahu, Tharmalingam Vijayakumar, Swaminathan Subramanian, Manju Rahi, Purushothaman Jambulingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kasinathan GunasekaranVector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Sudhansu Sekhar SahuVector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India. sssahu1961@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6022-049X
Tharmalingam VijayakumarVector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Swaminathan SubramanianVector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Manju RahiIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Purushothaman JambulingamVector Control Research Centre, Indian Council of Medical Research, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, 605006, India.
Indian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

WHO Pesticide Evaluation Scheme 2016/647868-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of resistance in vectors is one of the major impediments for malaria control. Adding synergists to insecticides has proven to be an alternative choice for controlling resistant mosquitoes. DawaPlus 3.0 and DawaPlus 4.0 are new long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in which deltamethrin and a synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) are added into filaments and their efficacy was tested against resistant malaria vector, Anopheles culicifacies in experimental huts in India.

methodsThe performance of two trial nets in terms of deterrence induced exiting, blood-feeding inhibition and mortality of An. culicifacies was compared with DawaPlus 2.0 and untreated net.

resultsThere was a significant reduction in entry, blood feeding and mortality (p < 0.05) and increase in exit rates of An. culicifacies in the treatment arms compared to untreated arm. But, both candidate LNs washed 20 times could not perform better than the washed reference net (DawaPlus 2.0). Cone bioassay results showed that all the treatment arms (both washed and unwashed) produced < 80% mortality of An. culicifacies before and after hut evaluation.

conclusionsDawaPlus 3.0 and DawaPlus 4.0 with their current specification may not be as effective as required to control the resistant vector, An. culicifacies, in east-central India.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesMosquito VectorsPesticide SynergistsAnimalsBiological AssayData Interpretation, StatisticalFeeding BehaviorHousingHumansIndiaInsecticide ResistanceInsecticide-Treated BednetsNitrilesPiperonyl ButoxidePoisson DistributiondecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPesticide SynergistsPiperonyl ButoxidePyrethrinsAnopheles culicifaciesDawaPlus 3.0DawaPlus 4.0Experimental hutsIndiaPiperonyl butoxide

Identifiers

PMID31973734
PMCPMC6979062
OpenAlexW3013871272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.