ArticleBMC genetics2020
The primordial tRNA acceptor stem code from theoretical minimal RNA ring clusters.
Article in BMC genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolution of the First Code.Genes · 2026Review
- Review
- Traces of a Primitive RNA Ring in Current Genomes.Biology · 2025Article
- Chemical Evolution of Life on Earth.Genes · 2025Review
- The 3 31 Nucleotide Minihelix tRNA Evolution Theorem and the Origin of Life.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evolution of the genetic code.Transcription · 2021Review
- Comparisons between small ribosomal RNA and theoretical minimal RNA ring secondary structures confirm phylogenetic and structural accretion histories.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- First arrived, first served: competition between codons for codon-amino acid stereochemical interactions determined early genetic code assignments.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTheoretical minimal RNA rings code by design over the shortest length once for each of the 20 amino acids, a start and a stop codon, and form stem-loop hairpins. This defines at most 25 RNA rings of 22 nucleotides. As a group, RNA rings mimick numerous prebiotic and early life biomolecular properties: tRNAs, deamination gradients and replication origins, emergence of codon preferences for the natural circular code, and contents of early protein coding genes. These properties result from the RNA ring's in silico design, based mainly on coding nonredundancy among overlapping translation frames, as the genetic code's codon-amino acid assignments determine. RNA rings resemble ancestral tRNAs, defining RNA ring anticodons and corresponding cognate amino acids. Surprisingly, all examined RNA ring properties coevolve with genetic code integration ranks of RNA ring cognates, as if RNA rings mimick prebiotic and early life evolution.
methodsDistances between RNA rings were calculated using different evolutionary models. Associations between these distances and genetic code evolutionary hypotheses detect evolutionary models best describing RNA ring diversification.
resultsHere pseudo-phylogenetic analyses of RNA rings produce clusters corresponding to the primordial code in tRNA acceptor stems, more so when substitution matrices from neutrally evolving pseudogenes are used rather than from functional protein coding genes reflecting selection for conserving amino acid properties.
conclusionsResults indicate RNA rings with recent cognates evolved from those with early cognates. Hence RNA rings, as designed by the genetic code's structure, simulate tRNA stem evolution and prebiotic history along neutral chemistry-driven mutation regimes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.