Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31973703›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

A hybrid simulation model approach to examine bacterial genome sequencing during a hospital outbreak.

Thomas M Elliott, Xing J Lee, Anna Foeglein, Patrick N Harris, Louisa G Gordon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of whole-genome sequencing during an outbreak of carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas M ElliottPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Brisbane, Q4006, Australia. thomas.elliott@qimrberghofer.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-7688
Xing J LeeAustralian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, 4059, Australia.
Anna FoegleinHeisenberg Analytics, Indooroopilly, QLD, 4068, Australia.
Patrick N HarrisCentral Microbiology, Pathology Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Louisa G GordonPopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Rd, Herston, Brisbane, Q4006, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital infection control requires timely detection and identification of organisms, and their antimicrobial susceptibility. We describe a hybrid modeling approach to evaluate whole genome sequencing of pathogens for improving clinical decisions during a 2017 hospital outbreak of OXA-181 carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli and the associated economic effects.

methodsCombining agent-based and discrete-event paradigms, we built a hybrid simulation model to assess hospital ward dynamics, pathogen transmission and colonizations. The model was calibrated to exactly replicate the real-life outcomes of the outbreak at the ward-level. Seven scenarios were assessed including genome sequencing (early or late) and no sequencing (usual care). Model inputs included extent of microbiology and sequencing tests, patient-level data on length of stay, hospital ward movement, cost data and local clinical knowledge. The main outcomes were outbreak size and hospital costs. Model validation and sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty around data inputs and calibration.

resultsAn estimated 197 patients were colonized during the outbreak with 75 patients detected. The total outbreak cost was US$318,654 with 6.1% of total costs spent on sequencing. Without sequencing, the outbreak was estimated to result in 352 colonized patients costing US$531,109. Microbiology tests were the largest cost component across all scenarios.

conclusionA hybrid simulation approach using the advantages of both agent-based and discrete-event modeling successfully replicated a real-life bacterial hospital outbreak as a foundation for evaluating clinical outcomes and efficiency of outbreak management. Whole genome sequencing of a potentially serious pathogen appears effective in containing an outbreak and minimizing hospital costs.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesComputer SimulationCross InfectionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGenome, BacterialHospitalsHumansModels, StatisticalWhole Genome SequencingBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseAgent-based modelDiscrete-event modelHospital outbreakPathogen sequencingSimulation modelingWhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31973703
PMCPMC6979342
OpenAlexW3008095688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.