Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31972788›Full record

SynthesisRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2020

MALONDIALDEHYDE LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Antonio Pinna, Francesco Boscia, Panagiotis Paliogiannis, Ciriaco Carru, Angelo Zinellu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Correspondence.Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio PinnaDepartment of Medical, Surgical, and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Francesco BosciaDepartment of Medical, Surgical, and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Panagiotis PaliogiannisDepartment of Medical, Surgical, and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Ciriaco CarruAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Angelo ZinelluDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
University of Sassari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeThe role of blood malondialdehyde (MDA) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of new blindness in industrialized countries, is still matter of debate. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published data on the MDA levels in AMD patients.

methodsPubMed, ISI Web of Sciences, and Scopus searches were performed according to MOOSE guidelines. Case-control studies were eligible for inclusion. Participants and controls were AMD patients and subjects without AMD, respectively. The main outcome measures were wet AMD and dry AMD. MDA level was the main exposure variable. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

resultsTwelve case-control studies were identified. A total of 634 AMD patients (mean age 66.7 years) and 656 controls without AMD (mean age 67.8 years) were evaluated. Extreme between-study heterogeneity was observed (I = 96.8%, P < 0.001). Pooled standardized mean difference showed that MDA values were significantly higher in patients with AMD (standardized mean difference = 1.91 µmol/L, 95% confidence interval = 1.08-2.74; P < 0.001). In a model including five studies, homogenous for age, sample matrix, and laboratory testing for MDA, heterogeneity decreased from extreme to moderate (I = 46.4%, P = 0.113), and pooled standardized mean difference, though attenuated, remained significantly higher in AMD patients (standardized mean difference = 1.07 µmol/L, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-1.31; P < 0.001).

conclusionThere is some evidence of higher levels of MDA in AMD patients compared with healthy controls; however, this result should be interpreted with caution because of extreme between-study heterogeneity and the possible effect of publication bias. Future studies, preferably well age-matched and of cohort design, are necessary before any firm conclusions on the putative role of elevated MDA on AMD can be drawn.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHumansMalondialdehydeWet Macular DegenerationBiomarkersMalondialdehyde

Identifiers

PMID31972788
OpenAlexW2946907436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.