Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31972765›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine

Treatment Trajectories During and After a Medication Trial for Opioid Use Disorder: Moving from Research as Usual to Treatment as Usual.

Marc Fishman, Hoa T Vo, Rachael Burgower, Michael Ruggiero, John Rotrosen, Josh Lee, Edward Nunes

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc FishmanMaryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, MD (MF, RB, MR); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (MF); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (HTV); New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY (JR, JL); New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (EN).
Hoa T Vo
Rachael Burgower
Michael Ruggiero
John Rotrosen
Josh Lee
Edward Nunes
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK MID-ATLANTIC COLLABORATIVE GROUPU10DA013034 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ROBERT P, STITZER, MAXINE L · 1999 to 2015
$25.2M
NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe effectiveness of treatment incorporating relapse prevention medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) is typically examined in research using rigidly predefined endpoints of success versus failure, usually over a single episode of care. But this perspective may not adequately portray the nonlinear trajectories typical of real-world treatment courses in this chronic, remitting, and relapsing disorder.

methodsThis descriptive study examined 12-month treatment trajectories of n = 60 patients enrolled at a single site of a larger multisite randomized controlled trial examining the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine versus extended-release naltrexone. While the parent study provided medication treatment through the research protocol for 6 months, this study documents treatment up to 12 months, including medications, provided through standard community resources (treatment as usual) outside of the protocol.

resultsSome patients continued medications past the end of the study intervention, whereas others did not. Some patients initiated medications other than the one assigned by the study. Some patients switched from 1 medication to the other. Many patients returned to treatment after 1 or more periods of dropout and/or relapse. Patients utilized multiple episodes of bed-based care, including short-term acute residential and long-term residential treatment, and also recovery housing supports. Described trajectories are also depicted graphically. At 12 months, while rates of continuous treatment retention were low (8%), rates of cross-sectional treatment engagement including return to treatment after drop out were higher (35%).

conclusionsThis description of nonlinear treatment trajectories highlights the potential benefits of flexibility and optimism in the promotion of re-engagement, despite interim outcomes that might traditionally be considered "failure" endpoints.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsBuprenorphineNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID31972765
PMCPMC7358110
OpenAlexW2999564057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.